20.500.12556/RUL-173996 Effects of vaccination passport on freedom of movement master's thesis Učinki cepilnih potrdil na svobodo gibanja magistrsko delo The COVID-19 pandemic made the governments to come up with measures like vaccination passports as a way of controlling the spread of the disease. In the process of writing this thesis, I analyze the effect of the passports on our freedom of movement and raised controversies regarding ethical questions legality, social justice and social divergence, I am going to research the UK and EU region while giving the examples and comparing some EU member states (Sweden, France), because its regulations largely follow European guidelines. I also examine how the restrictions impact different socio demographic groups, posing important questions around how fair they are, again declaring how fair access to vaccines were. I conducted an interview with Dr. Čedomir Sargić, who is the Head of Public Health at the Serbian Institute for Public Health, in order to collect more information about the health and ethical aspects of vaccination passports. Based on the interview, his observations indicate how, while vaccination passports may help minimize risk of transmission, they also came with issues of individual liberty and may inadvertently be part of discrimination unless supported by open communication, fair procedures, and institutions in which one has faith. The study tries to find a balance between public health and privacy of individuals, proposing how to manage and create ethical digital health policies. For vaccination passports to be trusted and safeguard people’s rights. The policies must be made with scientific transparency. Pandemija COVID-19 je prisilila vlade, da uvedejo ukrepe, kot so cepilni potni listi, kot način za obvladovanje širjenja bolezni. V tej nalogi analiziram učinek potrdil o cepljenju na svobodo gibanja ter izpostavljam sporna vprašanja glede etike, zakonitosti, socialne pravičnosti in družbene razdvojenosti. Osredotočil se bom na Združeno kraljestvo, ob tem pa bom podal tudi primere iz EU ter primerjal nekatere države članice EU (Švedska, Francija). Prav tako preučujem, kako so omejitve vplivale na različne socio-demografske skupine, in postavljam pomembna vprašanja o poštenosti teh ukrepov, vključno z vprašanjem, kako pravičen je bil dostop do cepiv. Opravil sem intervju z dr. Čedomirjem Sargićem, vodjo javnega zdravja na Inštitutu za javno zdravje Srbije, da bi pridobil dodatne informacije o zdravstvenih in etičnih vidikih potrdil o cepljenju. Na podlagi intervjuja njegove ugotovitve kažejo, da lahko cepilni potni listi sicer pomagajo zmanjšati tveganje prenosa virusa, vendar obenem prinašajo tudi vprašanja glede osebne svobode in lahko nehote vodijo do diskriminacije, če niso podprti z odprto komunikacijo, pravičnimi postopki in zaupanja vrednimi institucijami. Magistrska naloga skuša najti ravnovesje med javnim zdravjem in zasebnostjo posameznika ter predlaga, kako oblikovati etične digitalne zdravstvene politike v prihodnje. Da bi bila potrdila o cepljenju zaupanja vredna in bi varovala pravice ljudi, morajo biti politike oblikovane z znanstveno trnansparentnostjo. vaccination passports public health freedom of movement ethical policies social inequality potrdila o cepljenju javno zdravje svoboda gibanja etične politike socialna neenakost true true false N. Nikolić Angleški jezik Slovenski jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2025-09-26 07:30:03 2025-09-26 07:30:11 2025-11-15 04:09:00 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (56 str.)) 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 614:351(043.2) 181002 253690115 22758.pdf 22758.pdf 1 6280E79B7FD8DE143B7166CD6CBC3FE7 834556a6b713834982b21465e061d088273d86379e3b6d34a323990ec73e940f ae975ecb-9a99-11f0-9328-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=218734 Fakulteta za družbene vede 0 0 0