20.500.12556/RUL-170863 Analiza prakse informacijskega pooblaščenca pri posegih v zasebnost osebnih podatkov pri videonadzoru diplomsko delo Analysis of the practice of the Information Commissioner in relation to personal data protection in video surveillance V obdobju hitre rasti digitalizacije in avtomatizacije obdelave podatkov je pomembno skrbeti tudi za varstvo podatkov z vidika sodobnih družbenih in pravnih vprašanj. Podatki, ki so na dnevni ravni del obdelave s strani različnih avtomatiziranih naprav, postajajo vse pomembnejši del osebne integritete posameznikov. Zaradi intenzivnosti poseganja v to področje je pravna ureditev postala obvezni del poenotenega varovanja podatkov. Diplomsko delo podrobneje opisuje enega najhitreje rastočih in razvijajočih se področij nadzora. Čeprav mnogi videonadzor povezujejo le z načinom povečevanja varnosti imetja in ljudi, gre pri tem za kompleksnejši proces, ki mu hiter tehnološki napredek pripisuje vse več zlorab. Poseben poudarek je posvečen pristojnostim in nalogam IP v postopku kontrole nad izvajanjem videonadzora in ob enem povečevanju dobrih praks na tem področju v Sloveniji. Za boljše razumevanje opravljanja dela IP je v delu podrobneje opisana vsebina petih odločb IP, ki ponazarja napake nastale v postopkih izvajanja videonadzora. Zakonsko opredelitev in skladnost odločanja v odločbah IP sem preverjal z raznimi zakonskimi podlagami, med katerimi sta najbolj pripomogla ZVOP-1 in ZVOP-2, odvisno od izida odločbe IP. Analiza dela podarja, da je videonadzor v preveliki meri prikazan kot samoumeven način varovanja okolice, lastnine oziroma ljudi, pri čemer v resnici gre za veliko kompleksnejši način poseganja v varnost osebnih podatkov posameznikov, kateremu je potrebno posvečati veliko pozornosti in dodatnega tehničnega varstva. In an era marked by rapid growth in digitalisation and the automation of data processing, it is crucial to ensure data protection from the perspective of modern social and legal concerns. Data that is processed daily by various automated devices has become an increasingly significant part of individuals’ personal integrity. Due to the intensity of interference in this area, legal regulation has become an essential component of unified data protection. This thesis provides an in-depth examination of one of the fastest-growing and developing areas of surveillance. Although many people associate video surveillance merely with enhancing the security of property and people, it is in fact a far more complex process, increasingly susceptible to abuse as technological advances accelerate. Particular emphasis is placed on the powers and duties of the Information Commissioner in the process of monitoring the implementation of video surveillance and, at the same time, promoting good practices in this area in Slovenia. To better understand the work of the IC, the thesis provides a detailed description of five IP decisions that illustrate errors arising in video surveillance procedures. The legal framework and compliance of the IC’s decisions were verified through various legal sources, with ZVOP-1 and ZVOP-2 proving particularly helpful, depending on the specific outcome of each IP decision. The analysis highlights that video surveillance is often presented as a self-evident method of protecting surroundings, property, or individuals, whereas in reality, it involves a much more complex interference with the security of individuals’ personal data, requiring significant attention and additional technical safeguards. informacijski pooblaščenec videonadzor osebni podatki varnost osebnih podatkov pravica Information Commissioner video surveillance personal data personal data privacy right true false false [K. Pavlin] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2025-07-18 13:20:00 2025-07-18 13:20:09 2025-08-05 12:47:46 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana X, 71 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 342.738:681.772.7:35(497.4)(043.2) 18501 244880387 Pavlin_Kris_-_Analiza_prakse_informacijskega_pooblascenca_pri_posegih_v_zasebnost_osebnih_podatk.pdf Pavlin_Kris_-_Analiza_prakse_informacijskega_pooblascenca_pri_posegih_v_zasebnost_osebnih_podatk.pdf 1 E399A26910288A5FE8D31EAC7B8CC4BA 76c0c162a9e98309c6f0086f0cd252a0bd78838b8e85dfa534f46c912d1763c6 29ca8227-63c9-11f0-9328-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=213130 Fakulteta za upravo 0 0 0