20.500.12556/RUL-170713 Kritična analiza Boudonove teorije običajne racionalnosti magistrsko delo A critical analysis of Boudon's theory of ordinary rationality Magistrska naloga predstavi in kritično ovrednotiti Boudonovo teorijo običajne racionalnosti (TOR). Temeljna hipoteza TOR je, da so človeška dejanja in prepričanja posledice razlogov, ki jih imamo za ta dejanja in prepričanja. Magistrska naloga predstavi predpostavke in teoretske cilje TOR. Na podlagi le-teh trdi, da ima TOR mnoge teoretske prednosti, a tudi nekatere resne težave. Med temi sta najpomembnejši vprašljiva razlagalna moč TOR in možnost, da gre za neovrgljivo teorijo. Naloga predstavi tudi dve konkurenčni teoriji: teorijo racionalne izbire in teorijo dvojnega procesiranja. Teorija racionalne izbire nudi možnost zanimive primerjave s TOR, saj tudi sama človeško vedenje razlaga z racionalnimi razlogi, a ima bistveno ožji pojem racionalnosti. Na ta način se izogne mnogim težavam TOR, a zaradi ozkega pojmovanja racionalnosti ne more ponuditi splošen model človeškega vedenja. Teorije dvojnega procesiranja pa nudijo zanimivo primerjavo, saj trdijo, da je zgolj del človeškega vedenja racionalen. Magistrska naloga sklepa, da je TOR najbolj koristna kot del širše teorije človeškega vedenja, ki vključuje tudi obe omenjeni konkurenčni teoriji. Pri integraciji teh teorij so najverjetneje še posebej pomembne ugotovitve teorij dvojnega procesiranja glede tega, kdaj lahko pričakujemo, da bo človeško vedenje racionalno in kdaj ne. This thesis presents and critically evaluates Boudon's Theory of Ordinary Rationality (TOR). The basic hypothesis of TOR is that human actions and beliefs are the consequences of the reasons we have for those actions and beliefs. This thesis presents the assumptions and theoretical goals of TOR. Based on these, it argues that TOR has many theoretical advantages but also some serious problems. The most important of these are the questionable explanatory power of TOR and the possibility that it is an unfalsifiable theory. The thesis also presents two competing theories: rational choice theory and dual process theory. Rational Choice Theory offers an interesting comparison with TOR, as it also explains human behaviour in rational terms, but has a much narrower notion of rationality. In this way it avoids many of the problems of TOR, but because of its narrow conception of rationality it cannot offer a general model of human behaviour. Dual process theories, however, offer an interesting comparison, since they claim that only part of human behaviour is rational. The thesis concludes that TOR is most useful as part of a broader theory of human behaviour that also includes the two competing theories mentioned above. In integrating these theories, the findings of the dual process theories are likely to be particularly relevant with respect to when human behaviour can be expected to be rational and when it cannot. teorija običajne racionalnosti Raymond Boudon teorija racionalne izbire teorija dvojnega procesiranja model človeškega vedenja theory of ordinary rationality Raymond Boudon rational choice theory dual process theory model of human behaviour true false false [Ž. Žunec] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2025-07-13 08:16:22 2025-07-13 08:16:25 2026-02-10 12:41:40 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 61 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 316:001.5(043.2) 582785 245586691 51598.pdf 51598.pdf 1 BDD69844E48D7A89A914D099B1A01C3D c1c7ccd98b2dab6caba0db15f311cd82cc1e75a68eb9c7a9f6b85b07f676fd52 f9d9c7e7-5fae-11f0-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=212764 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0