20.500.12556/RUL-168896 Generalist vs physical education specialist elementary school teacher do teacher characteristics matter? Učitelj razrednega pouka ali športni pedagog so lastnosti učitelja pomembne? Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of motor skill development programs delivered by kinesiologists and generalist teachers in elementary school. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was used in which 79 primary school students aged 9 to 11 years participated. The participants were divided into a control group (n=36) taught by generalist teachers and an experimental group (n=43) taught by kinesiologists. Both groups were assessed on their abilities in five motor skills: forward roll, backward roll, 40-meter sprint, squat and hip hinge. The assessments were conducted at baseline and after a three-month intervention period. Results: In the experimental group, led by kinesiologists, there were statistically significant improvements in all the motor skills assessed. Scores for the 40-metre sprint increased from 3.60 to 4.01, for squats from 3.63 to 4.12, for backward rolls from 3.13 to 3.68, for forward rolls from 3.36 to 3.90, and for hips from 3.09 to 3.85 (all p<0.01). In the control group, which was taught by generalist teachers, only the 40-metre sprint improved significantly (from 3.49 to 3.85, p=0.01). Discussion: The results suggest that the specialized training and techniques of kinesiologists are more effective in promoting motor skill acquisition in primary school students than traditional methods used by generalist teachers. This emphasizes the potential for integrating kinesiologists into school physical education. Conclusions: Integrating kinesiologists into the physical education curriculum significantly enhances motor skill acquisition and argues for a reevaluation of current educational strategies to include professional kinesiology expertise. Namen: Cilj raziskave je bil oceniti primerjalno učinkovitost programov za razvoj gibalnih sposobnosti, ki jih izvajajo kineziologi in učitelji razrednega pouka. Metode: V raziskavo je bilo vključenih 79 osnovnošolskih učencev, starih 9–11 let. Razdeljeni so bili v kontrolno skupino (n=36), ki so jo poučevali učitelji razrednega pouka, in eksperimentalno skupino (n=43), ki so jo poučevali kineziologi. Obema skupinama smo s petimi testi ocenili gibalno učinkovitost: preval naprej, preval nazaj, 40-metrski šprint, počep in upogib bokov. Ocenjevanja so potekala teden dni pred in teden dni po zaključku trimesečnega intervencijskega obdobja. Rezultati: V eksperimentalni skupini, ki so jo vodili kineziologi, so se statistično značilno izboljšale vse ocenjene gibalne sposobnosti Rezultati za 40-metrski šprint so se izboljšali s 3,60 na 4,01, za počepe s 3,63 na 4,12, za preval nazaj s 3,13 na 3,68, za preval naprej s 3,36 na 3,90, in za upogib bokov s 3,09 na 3,85 (vsi p<0.01). V kontrolni skupini, ki so jo poučevali učitelji razrednega pouka, se je statistično značilno izboljšal le 40-metrski šprint (s 3,49 na 3,85, p=0.01). Diskusija: Rezultati so pokazali, da so specializirano usposabljanje in različne učne metode kineziologov učinkovitejše pri izboljševanju gibalnih sposobnosti pri osnovnošolskih učencih v primerjavi s tradicionalnimi učnimi metodami, ki jih uporabljajo učitelji razrednega pouka. Rezultati poudarjajo potencial za integracijo kineziologov v šolski predmet šport. Zaključek: Integracija kineziologov v učne ure športa lahko znatno izboljša gibalne sposobnosti učencev, zato bi bilo priporočljivo, da se strokovno znanje kineziologije sistematično vključi v učni načrt predmeta šport. motor skill acquisition kinesiology physical education primary school pedagogical strategies gibalne sposobnosti kineziologija predmet šport osnovna šola učne metode športna vzgoja učitelji true false true Angleški jezik Slovenski jezik Članek v reviji 2025-05-06 11:12:11 2025-05-06 11:12:13 2026-03-27 09:19:34 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 Str. 84-99 no. 1 Vol. 31 2025 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 37.011.3-051 1318-2269 10.52165/kinsi.31.1.84-99 234861315 RAZ_Gerovac_Ana_2025.pdf RAZ_Gerovac_Ana_2025.pdf 1 48031096EE58B24D8CA7EF5F7CDE5545 dc856e76188869cf034cf379a0f114cfda37edcd245ff465524a6692f0b243cb be2f043c-2a5a-11f0-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=209982 https://journals.uni-lj.si/kinsi/article/view/22025 0 cf8136bb-2a5a-11f0-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=209983 Pedagoška fakulteta Fakulteta za šport 0 0 0