20.500.12556/RUL-168601 Analiza novinarskega poročanja o nasilju na Psihiatrični kliniki Ljubljana s perspektive načel zapisovanja v socialnem delu magistrsko delo Analysis of journalistic coverage of violence at the Ljubljana Psychiatric Clinic from the perspective of the principles of reporting in social work Totalne institucije, katerih lastnosti ima tudi Univerzitetna psihiatrična klinika Ljubljana, veljajo za zaprte sisteme, v katerih je razmerje moči neenakomerno porazdeljeno, kar lahko privede do zlorabe moči in nasilja. Ker totalne institucije delujejo po premisi neprepustnosti, je kritičnim zunanjim opazovalcem otežen vstop vanje in njihovo delovanje težko nadzirajo. Med kritičnimi zunanjimi opazovalci so tudi novinarji, ki naj bi se pri poročanju držali osnovnih etičnih in novinarskih načel. Ta načela so podobna načelom zapisovanja v socialnem delu, med katerimi so najpomembnejša izogibanje vrednostnim sodbam, zaščita identitete virov, da zapisovalci informantom kot ljudem z izkušnjami verjamejo, da omogočijo javne pripovedi o izkušnjah in da pri tem uporabljajo ustrezen slog in jezik poročanja. V magistrski nalogi sem analizirala, ali lahko v načinu zapisovanja, ki ga je uporabila novinarka spletnega portala N1 Barbara M. Smajila v članku z naslovom Kaj se dogaja na Psihiatrični kliniki Ljubljana: razkrivamo pričevanja o nasilju, ki je vseboval več pričevanj žrtev in prič o nasilju zaposlenih nad pacienti na UPK Ljubljana, prepoznamo načela zapisovanja v socialnem delu. V raziskavi sem ugotovila, da je novinarka Smajila v svojem poročanju v veliki meri zasledovala načela zapisovanja v socialnem delu, zavedala se je občutljivosti teme in skupaj z uredniki tehtala o javnem interesu na eni strani in zaščiti žrtev na drugi. Glede odzivov pristojnih na novinarsko poročanje o nasilju na UPK Ljubljana sem ugotovila, da so se odgovorni za nadzor in odpravljanje odklonov zatekali predvsem v molk, zanikanje nasilja in diskreditacijo žrtev ter novinarjev. Pri poročanju so se novinarji spopadali z mnogimi preprekami, predstavniki uporabniških organizacij so do njihovega poročanja kritični, saj pravijo, da so nekatere izjave tudi nekritično povzemali. Posledice novinarskega poročanja se kažejo v tožbah proti novinarjem in pričam, strahu, ki so ga doživljali tako novinarji kot priče nasilja, umiku žrtev in prič iz javnosti in odpovedih delovnega razmerja zaposlenih na UPK Ljubljana. Kljub temu, da je večina posledic poročanja negativnih, pa je pozitivna posledica to, da so žrtve dobile afirmacijo, da si ne izmišljujejo, kar ima zdravilen učinek za celotno skupnost. Na podlagi prebrane literature in izvedenih intervjujev ter analizi sekundarnega gradiva ugotavljam, da je družbeno odgovorno novinarstvo partner etičnemu poslanstvu socialnega dela, saj med drugim krepi moč ranljivih skupin, a mora družba ustvariti ustrezne pogoje zanj s sistemsko zaščito kritičnih posameznikov. Total institutions, including the University Psychiatric Clinic of Ljubljana, are considered closed systems. Within such institutions, power relations are unevenly distributed, and violence may occur. Because total institutions operate on the premise of impermeability, it is difficult for critical outside observers to gain access and monitor their work. Critical external observers include journalists, who should adhere to basic ethical and journalistic principles when reporting. These principles are similar to those of social work reporting. The most important are to avoid value judgements, to protect the identity of sources, to trust informants as people with experience, to allow public narratives of experience, and to use appropriate reporting style and language. This master's thesis analyses whether the principles of social work writing can be recognised in the writing employed by Barbara M. Smajila, a journalist at the N1 web portal, in her article titled What is happening at the Ljubljana Psychiatric Clinic: exposing testimonies of violence. The article in question contained multiple testimonies from victims and witnesses of violence against patients by employees of the UPK Ljubljana. The findings show that Smajila's reporting largely followed the principles of social work reporting. She was aware of the sensitivity of the issue and, together with her editors, balanced the public interest on the one hand, and the protection of the victims on the other. It was found that the responses of the relevant authorities to the media coverage of violence at UPK Ljubljana mainly relied on silence, denial of the violence, and discrediting of the victims and journalists. Journalists faced many obstacles in their reporting, and representatives of user organisations are critical of their reporting, saying that some statements were uncritically reproduced. The repercussions of the journalists' reporting are shown in lawsuits against journalists and witnesses, as well as the fear experienced by both journalists and those who witnessed the acts of violence. Furthermore, the victims and witnesses have withdrawn from public life, while UPK Ljubljana staff have been dismissed. Although most of the consequences of reporting are negative, one positive consequence is that victims have received reassurance that they are not imagining things, which has had a healing effect on the whole community. Based on literature review, interviews, and the analysis of secondary sources, the thesis concludes that socially responsible journalism is a partner to the ethical mission of social work. It furthermore empowers vulnerable groups, but society must create the right conditions for this by systematically protecting critical individuals. totalne institucije družbeno odgovorno novinarstvo zaščita ranljivih skupin javni interes nasilje v instituciji duševno zdravje total institutions socially responsible journalism protection of vulnerable groups public interest institutional violence mental health true false false [E. Lipovšek] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2025-04-18 09:00:07 2025-04-18 09:00:43 2025-08-27 10:38:18 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 80 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 364.63:616.89 49723 246755331 16564.pdf 16564.pdf 1 0286608450A0CCDC634AB55E63491D2E 42b76aeee5722d760b91727ffb39b3fed82c2c06a6a33591b8cdbd782c8cecca b837006c-1c21-11f0-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=209477 Fakulteta za socialno delo 0 0 0