20.500.12556/RUL-164487 Vloga in pomen subsidiarnega upravnega spora v času epidemije COVID-19 Significance and function of the subsidiary administrative dispute during the COVID-19 epidemic Naloga obravnava subsidiarni upravni spor in njegovo uporabo v času epidemije COVID-19. Uvodoma je institut s predstavitvijo ustavne in zakonske podlage umeščen v slovenski upravnopravni red, v nadaljevanju pa so podrobno razčlenjeni njegovi konstitutivni elementi. Pri tem je posebej poudarjena obravnava teoretičnih vprašanj, ki so se kot problematična izkazala skozi presojo COVID zadev. Zasnovo sklene ovrednotenje položaja subsidiarnega upravnega spora v razmerju do postopkov varstva človekovih pravic, ki so posameznikom na voljo pred Ustavnim sodiščem. Delo v nadaljevanju splošno ponazori razmere, s katerimi sta se med epidemijo soočali tako izvršilna kot sodna veja oblasti, ter nato izčrpno analizira relevantno sodno prakso upravnega in Vrhovnega sodišča. Izhodiščno je pomen pripisan postopanju Ustavnega sodišča, katerega pristop je pomembno prispeval k zadržanosti upravnega sodišča do uporabe subsidiarnega upravnega spora. Sklepni del naloge ponudi primerjalnopravni prikaz ureditev v nemškem, francoskem in italijanskem pravu, po katerih bi se slovenski normodajalec lahko zgledoval pri sistemski reformi, ki bi omogočila vsebinsko presojo vprašanj, s katerimi so slovenski tožniki v relevantni praksi skušali pred upravnimi sodišči varovati svoje pravice. The thesis considers subsidiary administrative dispute and its exercise throughout the COVID-19 epidemic. To that end, the introduction discusses the instrument's disposition in the Slovenian administrative legal order through provision of its constitutional as well as statutory basis. Attention is further imparted upon the dissection of the subsidiary administrative dispute in regard to its constituent elements, with particular emphasis on the theoretical issues that arose in the course of the adjudication on the COVID cases. The prefatory section culminates in an evaluation of the status of subsidiary administrative litigation relative to the procedures for the protection of human rights accessible to individuals before the Constitutional Court. The paper proceeds to provide a brief overview of the circumstances faced by both the executive and the judiciary during the epidemic before delving into a comprehensive analysis of the relevant case law. Marked import is accorded to the methodology of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, the approach of which imperatively contributed to the reticence of the Administrative Court about the employment of subsidiary administrative dispute. The conclusion offers a synoptic comparative account of the relevant facets of German, French, and Italian legal systems, hence advancing a template for a prospective systemic reform should the Slovenian legislator opt to address the normative restraints that hindered substantive assessment of the issues raised in casi. subsidiarni upravni spor varstvo ustavnih pravic epidemija COVID-19 posamični akti oblastveno dejanje zavrženje tožbe subsidiary administrative dispute protection of constitutional rights COVID-19 epidemic individual act governing act dismissal of action true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2024-10-26 09:00:03 2024-10-26 09:00:08 2024-11-22 14:54:32 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2024 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 122158 214664707 19473.pdf 19473.pdf 1 6E341F8E237C852EA904A2D731784AF0 ba338f110ec3f78e0fc2986bca9192bb693d071f1181ebc3416be08a9df626b3 a0e2682b-9367-11ef-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=194960 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0