20.500.12556/RUL-164119 Identiteta, etika prepričanja, razumnost in resonanca Identity, ethics of belief, rationality, and resonance Prispevek1 se ukvarja z vprašanji spoznavnih dokazil za naša prepričanja oz. etiko prepričanj, pri čemer se podrobneje posveča problematiki nestrinjanja. Kaj obstoj nestrinjanja med menoj in drugim pomeni za razumnost sprejemanja prepričanja, ki je predmet tega nestrinjanja? Tu zagovarjamo stališče, da zgolj obstoj takšnega nestrinjanja ne pomeni nujno, da je (najbolj ali celo edino) razumno naše prepričanje opustiti – zlasti v primeru verskih prepričanj. To tezo lahko opremo na izhodiščno raven razumnosti, ki jo poimenujemo izkustvena razumnost in ki v veliki meri vključuje tudi spoznavna dokazila, ki jih ne moremo nujno izrecno ubesediti ali posredovati. In prav ta v položaju nestrinjanja pogosto igrajo pomembno vlogo. Obenem pa je ta tema povezana z mislijo Hartmuta Rosa, posebej njegovo teorijo resonance in tezo o oblikah novih identitet, ki so posledica družbene pohitritve časa. Te so zelo pomembne tudi z vidika posameznikovih prepričanj ter razumnosti. Teorija resonance ponuja tudi nastavke za razumevanje vidika, da je nestrinjanje inherentni gradnik resonance – in ne nekaj, kar bi slednja izključevala ali odpravljala. Ob koncu na tej podlagi oblikujemo tudi novo osvetlitev nekaterih izzivov sodobnega časa, kot so spoznavni mehurčki, odmevne komore in spoznavni vidiki identitetne politike. The paper deals with the issues of evidence for our beliefs or the ethics of belief, with a specific focus being on the problem of disagreement. What does the existence of a disagreement between me and others mean for the rationality of accepting the belief in question that is the subject of disagreement? In connection with this, we advocate the view that the mere existence of such disagreement does not necessarily mean that it is most (or even only) rational to abandon our belief, especially in the case of religious beliefs. The latter can be linked to a primary level of rationality, which we call experiential rationality and which, to a large extent, also includes evidential support that one cannot necessarily express explicitly or communicate. This aspect often plays a vital role in a situation of disagreement. At the same time, this topic is related to the thought of Hartmut Rosa, especially his theory of resonance and his thesis about the forms of new identities that result from the social acceleration of time. The latter identities are very important from the point of view of individual beliefs and rationality. The theory of resonance also offers means for understanding the aspect, according to which disagreement itself is an inherent building block of resonance and not something that the latter excludes or eliminates. At the end, on this basis of all this, a new illumination of some challenges of modern times, such as epistemic bubbles, echo chambers, and epistemic aspects of identity politics, is put forward. etika prepričanj nestrinjanje razumnost identiteta resonanca ethics of belief disagreement rationality identity resonance true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Članek v reviji 2024-10-17 07:26:38 2024-10-17 07:26:38 2024-10-18 04:18:03 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2022 0 0 Str. 547-559 [št.] 3 Letn. 82 2022 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2022-01-01 17:159.923.2 0006-5722 10.34291/BV2022/03/Strahovnik 134559235 Strahovnik.pdf Strahovnik.pdf 1 39922F44DA4A64B6B9C60DCED0E866E4 63b24b0107d9c7ed0cdc91609e1dfef1ebace25e9ad85621ddaa17a30ae4f61a 21ca8409-8c48-11ef-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=194255 https://www.teof.uni-lj.si/zaloznistvo/bogoslovni-vestnik/bogoslovni-vestnik-82-2022-3 0 6a95285c-8c4a-11ef-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=194264 Teološka fakulteta 0 0 0