20.500.12556/RUL-163747 Meso in telo, človek in žival, logos in falos Meat and body, human and animal, logos and phallus Izhajam iz opažanja, da je ločitev človeka od ostalega bivajočega in določitev neke njegove lastnosti, ki ga (nujno hierarhično) ločuje od vsega ostalega, predvsem od narave oziroma od živali ali »živalskega« v njem samem, očitna težnja zahodne religije, metafizike, filozofije in znanosti. Med subjektom in objektom, med človekom in živaljo je vedno razmerje moči, pri čemer dominantni pol določa označevalni red, vrsto razlike in utrjuje mehanizme razlikovanja, ki skozi fiksacijo na limito proizvajajo pomen drugega. Edninski pojem »žival«, na katerem sloni identiteta človeka, postane negativni princip kot tak ali vsota vseh pomanjkljivosti. Skozi prizmo Derridajevega koncepta karnofalogocentrizma, mehanizma postajanja antropo-centričnega zahodnega subjekta, raziskujem odnose nasilja, žrtvene strukture in zaužitvene sheme med človekom in živaljo. Zanima me, kako sta simbolno nasilje, ki zadaja nasilje heterogeni množici bitij, tako da jo rekonstruira pod znakom identitete »kot take« ali »na splošno«, kot »žival«, in realno ali fizično nasilje povezana ter soodvisna. Realno nasilje, katerega paradigmatski primer je zaužitje živalskega mesa, in simbolno nasilje, izraženo skozi metaforično zaužitje živali skozi jezik in reprezentacijo nasploh, se prepletata in medsebojno omogočata in vzdržujeta. The starting point is the observation that the separation of the human from everything else of living and the determination of some of his characteristic, which (necessarily hierarchically) separate him from everything else, especially from nature, or from animals or the “animal” in himself, is an obvious tendency of Western religion, metaphysics, philosophy and science. There is always a relationship of power between subject and object, between the human and the animal, whereby the dominant pole determines the signifying order, the type of difference, and consolidates the mechanisms of differentiation, which, through the fixation on the limit, produce the meaning of the other. The singular concept “animal”, on which the identity of man is based, becomes a negative principle as such or the sum of all shortcomings. I explore the relations of violence, sacrificial structures and consumption schemes between the man and the animal through the prism of Derrida's concept of carnophalogocentrism, the mechanism of becoming an anthropo-centric Western subject. I am interested in how symbolic violence, which inflicts violence on a heterogeneous multitude of beings, by reconstructing it under the sign of identity “as such” or “in general”, as an “animal”, and real or physical violence are related and interdependent. Real violence, of which the ingestion of animal flesh is a paradigmatic example, and symbolic violence, expressed through the metaphorical ingestion of animals through language and representation in general, are intertwined and mutually enabled and sustained. žival človek meso karnofalogocentrizem žrtvovanje nasilje animal human meat carnophalogocentrism sacrifice violence true false false U. Jenčič Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2024-10-10 11:20:02 2024-10-10 11:20:08 2025-01-22 12:08:47 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2024 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 125 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 159.964.26:364.632(043.2) 560900 223388931 43726.pdf 43726.pdf 1 5D3A1554AFA20E8F3AD660111F49F733 f5da8bb48ac574461d924e67b1f70859008eb1b3c909270b841128fa87c564c3 a949c934-86e8-11ef-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=193654 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0