20.500.12556/RUL-163397 Družbena in kulturna refleksija v življenju in mišljenju Antona Trstenjaka Socio-cultural reflection in the life and thought of Anton Trstenjak V središču delovanja Antona Trstenjaka je človek. Zato ima posebno mesto njegovega znanstvenega zanimanja antropologija, vendar ne kot posebna panoga, ampak kot iskanje odgovora na vprašanje, kdo je človek in kako živeti skupaj v medosebnih odnosih, v družbi in kulturi. V prispevku obravnavamo Trstenjakovo znanstveno-strokovno in človeško izkustveno »refleksijo« družbe in kulture. Posebej smo pozorni na njegovo razumevanje človeka kot osebe in bitja simbola, ne razuma. Njegov pristop ima močno in šibko stran. Močna se nam zdi ta, da mu je prav temeljna intuicija o osebi in simbolu omogočila globok vpogled v dušo človeka, naroda, kulture. Šibke pa so nekatere omejitve in nedorečenosti, zato Trstenjakovo misel kritično soočimo z avtorji, ki so temo osebe in simbola poglobili. V nadaljevanju prispevka obravnavamo njegove misli o slovenskem človeku, družini in narodu. Menimo, da so njegove misli še vedno aktualne in jim je vredno prisluhniti. Prispevek sklenemo z razmislekom o tem pomenu Trstenjakovih misli za naš čas. Tega, tako menimo, ni mogoče pokazati brez upoštevanja njegove refleksije petih velikih mislecev, ki so mu bili ključna miselna referenca in izziv, kako se soočiti z izbirami življenja. At the center of Trstenjak's life and work is man. This is why anthropology has a special place in his scientific interest, not as a specific discipline, but as a search for an answer to the question who a human being is and how to live together in interpersonal relationships, in society and in culture. In the paper, we discuss Trstenjak's scientific and human-experiential »reflections« of society and culture. We are particularly attentive to his understanding of man as a person and as a being of symbol, not of reason. His approach has a strong and a weak side. The strong one seems to be his fundamental intuition about the person and the symbol that enabled him to have a deep insight into the soul of man, nation, and culture. The weakness of the approach, however, is some of its limitations and ambiguities, so we critically confront Trstenjak's thought with authors who have deepened the theme of the person and the symbol. In the next part of the paper, we discuss his thoughts on the Slovenian man, family and nation. We believe that his thoughts are still relevant and worthy of attention. The paper concludes with a reflection on the importance of Trstenjak's thoughts for our times. This, we believe, cannot be shown without taking into account his reflection on the five great thinkers who for him were a key mental reference and the challenge of how to face the choices of life. oseba občestvo skupnost simbol narod slovenski narodni značaj kultura person communion symbol nation Slovenian national character culture true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Članek v reviji 2024-10-07 09:29:36 2024-10-07 09:29:37 2024-10-10 03:24:56 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2023 0 0 Str. 129-148 št. 1 Letn. 78 2023 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2023-01-01 316:008Trstenjak A. 2335-4127 10.34291/Edinost/78/01/Bahovec 168282883 Bahovec.pdf Bahovec.pdf 1 AA728164B17C2704BC6D638B80E4A096 acf4b248a3490c64dda19a454119458e1b3a2148aa5ade7d1b94a8d5bfc5dc59 bc054c33-847d-11ef-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=193014 https://www.teof.uni-lj.si/zaloznistvo/edinost-in-dialog/edinost-in-dialog-78-2023-1 0 59bc3f0d-847e-11ef-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=193017 Teološka fakulteta 0 0 0