20.500.12556/RUL-163224 Colat alius Deum, alius Iovem Tertulijan, verska svoboda (libertas religionis) in verski pluralizem Colat alius Deum, alius Iovem Tertullian, freedom of religion (libertas religionis) and religious pluralism Avtor v prispevku analizira Tertulijanovo inovativno sintagmo »verska svoboda« (libertas religionis) z več perspektiv, ko predstavi zgodovinski in literarni kontekst, znotraj katerega je kartažanski mislec lahko skoval to idejo. V drugem delu študije, ki je posvečena kritičnemu premisleku o razmerju med versko svobodo in verskim pluralizmom v Tertulijanovi optiki, postane jasno, da ob nastanku načela verske svobode ob koncu 2. stoletja v severni Afriki vsaj pri kartažanskem učitelju ni govora o kakšnem verskem indiferentizmu. Tertulijan namreč drugim religijam nameni največjo, pavlinski podobno koncesijo zgolj v tem, da priznava, da tudi druge religije po naravi, četudi nezavedno, že častijo enega pravega Boga, Boga kristjanov. Po Tertulijanovem prepričanju je namreč že vsaka človeška duša po naravi krščanska, vendar tega prepričanja ni mogoče enačiti z načelnim sprejemanjem verskega pluralizma v smislu indiferentizma This paper analyses Tertullian’s innovative syntagm “religious freedom” (libertas religionis) from several perspectives, presenting the historical and literary context that enabled the Carthaginian thinker to coin this idea. In the second part of the study, which is devoted to a critical reflection on the relationship between religious freedom and religious pluralism in Tertullian’s optic, it becomes clear that when the principle of religious freedom emerged at the end of the 2nd century in North Africa, at least in the case of the Carthaginian teacher, there was no talk of any religious indifferentism. Tertullian makes the greatest Pauline-like concession to other religions in merely recognising that other religions, even if unconsciously, already worship the one true God, the God of the Christians. For Tertullian believes that every human soul is already Christian by nature, but this belief cannot be equated with a principled acceptance of religious pluralism in the sense of indifferentism. religiologija primerjalno veroslovje verski indiferentizem medreligijski dialog poganstvo krščanstvo religious studies comparative religion religious indifferentism interreligious dialogue paganism Christianity true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Članek v reviji 2024-10-04 13:20:14 2024-10-04 13:20:15 2024-10-07 09:22:18 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2022 0 0 Str. 73-87 št. 2 Letn. 77 2022 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2022-01-01 27-67-423.4Tertulijan 2335-4127 10.34291/Edinost/77/02/Bogataj 135363331 Bogataj.pdf Bogataj.pdf 1 1E43B34CFBA4D66D64EBD7386E99627E 0e08bcef0da1dddfa54bc5083ba8cbfac1510fa10ae4ed5639582f6e511fe2c1 77109fff-8242-11ef-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=192804 https://www.teof.uni-lj.si/zaloznistvo/edinost-in-dialog/edinost-in-dialog-77-2022-2 0 9e22310b-8243-11ef-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=192946 Teološka fakulteta Edinost in dialog 0 0 0