20.500.12556/RUL-162225 Pojem kreposti v Platonovih dialogih The concept of virtue in Plato’s dialogues V diplomskem delu skušam predstaviti in analizirati Platonovo opredelitev kreposti, kot jo postavi v dialogih Država, Fajdon, Gorgija, Menon in Protagora. Najprej predpostavljam enovitost delov kreposti, pri čemer so najpomembnejši pogum, modrost, premišljenost in pravičnost, ki so v zadnji instanci eno, saj izvirajo iz istega. Predlagam, da Platon postavi tri temeljne opredelitve kreposti. Prva opredelitev je osnovana na podlagi polisa in treh stanov, ki nastanejo v njem. Druga izvira iz delitve duše na tri dele. Pri obeh opredelitvah je bistvenega pomena harmonična povezanost delov oziroma stanov in vladanje modrosti nad preostalimi deli/stanovi. Tretja in najbolj ključna opredelitev kot podlago jemlje filozofovo zmožnost uzrtja Dobrega, ki mu daje vednost o tem, kaj je krepost in kako krepostno delovati. Vse tri opredelitve so med seboj povezane, prepletene in se dopolnjujejo. Krepost, ki nastane v duši in polisu namreč filozofu pomaga na poti k uzrtosti Dobrega, medtem ko uzrtost Dobrega nastanek kreposti v duši in polisu šele omogoča. In the undergraduate thesis, I aim to present and analyse Plato’s definition of virtue, as he presents it in his dialogues The Republic, Phaedo, Gorgias, Meno, and Protagoras. First, I posit a fundamental unity of all parts of virtue. Here, the most important ones are courage, wisdom, temperance and justice, which are ultimately one, since they have the same origin. I suggest that Plato presents three basic definitions of virtue. The first definition is based on the concept of the polis and the three classes which emerge within it. The second springs from the division of the soul into three parts. For both definitions, the harmonious relation between the parts or classes, and the rule of wisdom over the other parts/classes, is key. The third and most important definition takes as its basis the philosopher’s ability to perceive the Form of the Good, which gives him the knowledge of what virtue is and how to act virtuously. All three definitions are interconnected, intertwined and complement each other. The virtue that arises in the soul and the polis helps the philosopher in his ascend to the apprehension of the Form of the Good, while the apprehension of the Form of the Good in turn makes the emergence of virtue in the soul and the polis possible. krepost Platon ideja Dobrega duša polis virtue Plato Form of the Good polis soul true false false Z. K. Kenda Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2024-09-20 07:47:25 2024-09-20 07:47:28 2025-02-04 09:55:10 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2024 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 32 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 17Platon(043.2) 554779 224988931 40702.pdf 40702.pdf 1 4BA7AD87FA1220E14F3AD274953F97A4 eed55988dacdd92731e2ecb693143c089e41bd359f00369fa809e61ec021599d b5d34553-7713-11ef-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=191413 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0