20.500.12556/RUL-158446 Trade-offs and synergies of soil carbon sequestration addressing knowledge gaps related to soil management strategies Soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in agricultural soils is an importanttool for climate change mitigation within the EU soil strategy for 2030 and canbe achieved via the adoption of soil management strategies (SMS). These strategies may induce synergistic effects by simultaneously reducing greenhousegas (GHG) emissions and/or nitrogen (N) leaching. In contrast, other SMS maystimulate emissions of GHG such as nitrous oxide (N$_2$O) or methane (CH$_4$),offsetting the climate change mitigation gained via SOC sequestration. Despitethe importance of understanding trade-offs and synergies for selecting sustain-able SMS for European agriculture, knowledge on these effects remains lim-ited. This review synthesizes existing knowledge, identifies knowledge gapsand provides research recommendations on trade-offs and synergies betweenSOC sequestration or SOC accrual, non-CO$_2$ GHG emissions and N leachingrelated to selected SMS. We investigated 87 peer-reviewed articles that addressSMS and categorized them under tillage management, cropping systems, watermanagement and fertilization and organic matter (OM) inputs. SMS, such as conservation tillage, adapted crop rotations, adapted water management, OMinputs by cover crops (CC), organic amendments (OA) and biochar, contributeto increase SOC stocks and reduce N leaching. Adoption of leguminous CC orspecific cropping systems and adapted water management tend to create trade-offs by stimulating N$_2$O emissions, while specific cropping systems or application of biochar can mitigate N$_2$O emissions. The effect of crop residues on N$_2$O emissions depends strongly on their C/N ratio. Organic agriculture and agro-forestry clearly mitigate CH$_4$ emissions but the impact of other SMS requiresadditional study. More experimental research is needed to study the impact ofboth the pedoclimatic conditions and the long-term dynamics of trade-offs andsynergies. Researchers should simultaneously assess the impact of (multiple)agricultural SMS on SOC stocks, GHG emissions and N leaching. This reviewprovides guidance to policymakers as well as a framework to design fieldexperiments and model simulations, which can address knowledge gaps andnon-intentional effects of applying agricultural SMS meant to increase SOC sequestration. CH$_4$ climate change mitigation conservation agriculture cropping systems EJP SOIL N$_2$O nitrogen leaching organic matter inputs tillage water management pedologija tla trajnostno gospodarjenje s tlemi ohranitveno kmetijstvo blažitev klimatskih sprememb izpiranje dušika obdelava tal upravljanje z vodami true false true Angleški jezik Slovenski jezik Članek v reviji 2024-06-10 17:13:19 2024-06-10 17:13:28 2024-06-28 03:22:16 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2024 0 0 21 str. Iss. 3, art. e13515 Vol. 75 2024 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 631.4 1351-0754 10.1111/ejss.13515 198370819 European_J_Soil_Science_-_2024_-_Maenhout_-_Trade‐offs_and_synergies_of_soil_carbon_sequestration_Addressing_knowledge.pdf European_J_Soil_Science_-_2024_-_Maenhout_-_Trade‐offs_and_synergies_of_soil_carbon_sequestration_Addressing_knowledge.pdf 1 6FFF5BBA791ACEF52D89821C619A1DEF f412bd7284ed881360c896705b8f63930d4a6208680958b8a9835a99b8d0e2aa c81fe463-273e-11ef-8889-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=186073 https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13515 1 ff9e8315-273b-11ef-8889-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=186072 Biotehniška fakulteta 0 0 0