20.500.12556/RUL-156347 Advocates or observers? Slovenian newsworkers and climate change This paper analyses perceptions of the climate crisis by newsworkers of Slovenian (online) media and their news coverage of this topic. Through qualitative analysis of the in-depth interviews, the paper offers insights into the attitudes, perceptions, and motivations of selected Slovenian journalists and editors about climate change reporting and new insights into journalism practice and environmental journalism in Slovenia in terms of the peculiarities and contextual factors that can influence coverage of extreme weather events and climate change. The results show that the environmental and climate topics are underrepresented in Slovenian media, and these topics are covered in accordance with newsworthiness and public liking factors, and marketing neoliberal pressures to sell the news and make a profit. Such a commercialization and popularization of environmental journalism might lead to the passiveness of the audiences since it does not mobilize public awareness but rather represents the environmental topic as just another story in the media. The lack of analytical depth, critical problematization, wider contextualization of climate change, and the exaltation of journalistic norms of dramatization, eventization, noveltyization, and personalization prevent grasping the problem holistically. Prispevek analizira, kako novinarji slovenskih (spletnih) medijev dojemajo podnebno krizo in poročajo o njej. S kvalitativno analizo poglobljenih intervjujev ponuja vpogled v stališča, zaznave in motivacijo izbranih slovenskih novinarjev in urednikov pri poročanju o podnebnih spremembah ter nove vpoglede v novinarsko prakso in okoljsko novinarstvo v Sloveniji z vidika posebnosti in kontekstualnih dejavnikov, ki lahko vplivajo na poročanje o ekstremnih vremenskih dogodkih in pod-nebnih spremembah. Rezultati kažejo, da so okoljske in podnebne teme v slovenskih medijih premalo zastopane, obravnavane pa so v skladu z dejavniki objavljanja in všečnosti javnosti ter marketinškimi neoliberalnimi pritiski po prodaji novic in ustvarjanju dobička. Takšna komercializacija in popularizacija okoljskega novinarstva bi lahko vodila v pasivnost občinstva, saj ne mobilizira zavedanja javnosti, temveč predstavlja okoljsko temo kot le še eno zgodbo v medijih. Pomanjkanje analitične poglobljenosti, kritičnega problematiziranja, širše kontekstualizacije podnebnih sprememb ter povzdigovanje novinarskih norm dramatizacije, eventizacije, novosti in personalizacije, namreč onemogočajo celostno dojemanje problema. climate crisis Anthropocene environmental journalism journalistic conventions editorial politics interviews podnebna kriza antropocen okoljsko novinarstvo novinarske konvencije uredniška politika intervjuji true false true Angleški jezik Slovenski jezik Slovenija; Članek v reviji 2024-05-21 10:33:24 2024-05-21 10:33:29 2024-05-28 09:19:19 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2024 0 0 Str. 69-96 no. 1 Vol. 30 2024 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 070(497.4):551.583 2232-3716 10.5281/zenodo.11214246 196075267 Jontes_et_al_AN.pdf Jontes_et_al_AN.pdf 1 40950C084B9C521E303F180F4A30A55D 9358d971e4b447b55bc20e06d1f56dd2fd50855d9eb8ac4124986d2b48bb0918 84935dcd-174d-11ef-b8e5-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=183762 https://anthropological-notebooks.zrc-sazu.si/Notebooks/article/view/638 0 8ec3fe62-174d-11ef-b8e5-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=183763 Fakulteta za družbene vede 0 0 0