20.500.12556/RUL-156012 Nepravo ravnanja in nepravo uspeha The injustice of criminal acting and the injustice of criminal success Temeljno vprašanje, ki ga obravnava predmetna doktorska disertacija je, ali slovenski zakonodajalec pri določanju kaznivih dejanj, zakonskih znakov in še posebej prepovedane posledice upošteva tri doktrinarno priznane funkcije vrednostne presoje neprava delikta? Moderna doktrina poudarja, da naj bi za vse inkriminacije posebnega dela (vsaj) načeloma veljal kazenskopravni aksiom o zahtevani podanosti neprava ravnanja in neprava uspeha. To pomeni, da mora biti inkriminacijska norma v delu, ki opisuje bit kaznivega dejanja (objektivni in subjektivni zakonski znaki kaznivega dejanja), (praviloma) oblikovana skladno s tem pravilom, določeni morajo biti zakonski znaki, ki opredeljujejo (storitveno ali opustitveno) izvršitveno ravnanje in prepovedano posledico. Le takšna kazenskopravna norma lahko učinkovito varuje kazenskopravno dobrino kot osrednji cilj inkriminacije. Predmetna doktorska disertacija ponudi odgovor na doktrinarna vprašanja, kaj pomeni nepravo (delikta), kakšne funkcije ima oziroma naj ima vrednostna presoja neprava v postopku določanja kaznivih dejanj ter ali je pristop slovenskega zakonodajalca, ki v posameznih (sicer relativno številnih) inkriminacijah daje prednost nepravu uspeha (pred nepravom ravnanja), skladen z moderno kazenskopravno doktrino in predvsem s tisto vsebino oziroma podstatjo, kot jo sporoča nepravo (posameznega) delikta. The fundamental question addressed in this doctoral dissertation is whether the Slovenian legislator takes into account the three doctrinally recognised functions of the injustice judgment of a criminal act in determining the offences, the statutory elements and, in particular, the prohibited criminal success. The modern doctrine emphasises that the criminal law axiom of the requisite injustice of criminal acting and criminal success should (at least) in principle apply to all criminal norms. This means that the criminal norm, in the part describing the essence of the offence (objective and subjective elements of the offence), must (as a rule) be formulated in accordance with this rule, the legal elements defining the (commission or omission of) the criminal acting and the prohibited success (consequence) must be specified. Only such a criminal norm can effectively protect the goods as the central objective of criminalisation. The doctoral dissertation offers an answer to the doctrinal questions of what is meant by the injustice of the criminal act, what functions the value judgement of the injustice has or should have in the process of determining criminal offences, and whether the approach of the Slovenian legislator, which gives priority to the injustice of the success (as opposed to the injustice of criminal acting) in individual (relatively numerous) incriminations, is consistent with modern criminal law doctrine and, most importantly, with the content or the essence of the injustice of the (individual) offence as it is communicated by the injustice of the criminal act. Nepravo izvršitveno ravnanje prepovedana posledica objektivni pogoj kaznivosti odgovornost za hujšo posledico nepravo poskusa kazenskopravna norma Injustice criminal acting criminal success objective condition of criminality liability for a serious consequence attempt criminal norm true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Doktorsko delo/naloga 2024-04-27 09:00:09 2024-04-27 09:00:15 2024-05-13 14:55:40 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2024 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 117279 195275267 14704.pdf 14704.pdf 1 2DCBC89FCF6221C07C14B97B69C1A9A0 b00fa61776fb7194aa6400abcad4efe8ed2924d126691965d818fcac31588d6b ccfc0669-0463-11ef-a2d2-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=183212 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0