20.500.12556/RUL-155645 Naravno pravo danes; Kritika temeljnih naziranj naravnopravne šole Johna Finnisa Contemporary Natural Law; Critique of Basic Assertions of John Finnis's Natural Law Magistrsko diplomsko delo podaja oris ter kritiko naravnopravne teorije Johna Finnisa. Pri tem je njegova vplivna šola naravnega prava postulirana kot sopomenka pojma »naravno pravo danes«. Prispevek je sestavljen iz treh vsebinskih sklopov. Prvi del ponuja strnjen prikaz Finnisovega naravnega prava ter analizo razmerja med naravnim in pozitivnim pravom v njegovi teoriji. Izpostavljenih pa je tudi nekaj vidikov iz splošnega pravnofilozofskega razpravljanja o naravnem pravu in pravnem pozitivizmu, saj je dosledna obravnava njunega soobstoja nujna za tehtno razpravljanje o naravnem pravu. V drugem, obsežnejšem delu, pa prispevek podaja poglobljeno vsebinsko analizo ter kritičen komentar izbranih vidikov Finnisove naravnopravne filozofije. Levji delež kritike je usmerjen zlasti zoper Finnisovo ignoriranje empiričnih dognanj znanosti ter nekritično sprejemanje nekaterih miselnih smeri pri snovanju naravnopravne teorije. Slednja je posledično znatno protidejstvena, hkrati pa od naslovnika terja apriorno sprejemanje nekaterih miselnih predpostavk. Tretji, zadnji vsebinski sklop pa opozori na nekatere slogovne napake in neformalne logične zmote, ki jih Finnis zagreši pri rigoroznem vpeljevanju omenjenih miselnih predpostavk v svojo teorijo. Vse navedeno pod vprašaj postavlja dostopnost argumentov in sklepov Finnisovega naravnega prava tudi tistim posameznikom, ki posedujejo drugačen svetovni nazor. The master's thesis delivers both the outline and critique of John Finnis's natural law. Throughout this paper, term »contemporary natural law« is used interchangeably with term »Finnis's natural law«. The content of this paper is divided into three parts. The first part introduces a brief elucidation of Finnis's natural law theory and Finnis's analysis of the interaction between natural and positive law. On the top of that, certain common perspectives on the interplay between legal positivism and natural law theories are pointed out. After all, meticulous dissection of those concepts is a prerequisite of any profound discussion on natural law. The second part delivers a comprehensive discussion and critical examination of the selected postulates of Finnis's natural law. An overwhelming majortity of criticism is directed against Finnis's ignorance of the empirical scientific data and his uncritical acceptance of certain lines of reasoning. As a result, his natural law theory is considerably counterfactual. Aditionally, it requires readers' adoption of rather specific reasoning. Finally, the third part highlights some of Finnis's writing style shortcomings as well as some informal fallacies that occur within his opus. Those slipups can be attributed to Finnis's rigour while following a certain train of thought. All these perspectives make the acceptance of Finnis's natural law arguments and conclusions a rather hard task for those whose worldview differs from Finnis's. Finnis John (1940-) George Robert (1955-) filozofija prava naravno pravo pravni pozitivizem etika razum nevroznanost religija Finnis John (1940-) George Robert (1955-) philosophy of law natural law legal positivism ethics reason neuroscience religion true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2024-04-10 08:00:09 2024-04-10 08:00:18 2024-05-20 13:24:36 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2024 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 117252 195981059 17356.pdf 17356.pdf 1 B410E51362F781BE409689E015A0D1E2 ac1e7fc3e2ad735c11773242175bcb4bb8ed7e30cf11780b1508e6fc6692fd75 9e14d040-f6ff-11ee-ae5d-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=182648 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0