20.500.12556/RUL-155542 Ali stavbna identiteta še obstaja? je potrebno stavbno identiteto redefinirati? Does building identity still exist? does the building identity needs to be redefined? V članku je predstavljena vsebina o redefiniciji kontinuitete in prepoznavnosti elementov stavbne identitete pri novejših gradnjah, v kontekstu arhitekturnih regij in krajin, ki jih je v 90-ih letih prejšnjega stoletja določil prof. Peter Fister. Zaradi množičnosti »samograditeljskih« posegov v 80-ih se je kontinuiteta prenosa tradicionalnih elementov stavbne dediščine na novogradnje prekinila – tako na nivoju posamezne stavbe kot tudi na nivoju naselja. V članku je opisan postopek odkrivanja in, s pomočjo sodobnih programskih orodij, vrednotenja tistih primerov novejših gradenj, pri katerih je bilo, kljub vplivom različnih trendov, mogoče prepoznati ohranitev tradicionalnih nosilcev stavbne identitete. Raziskava na nivoju naselja in stavbe je bila opravljena na območju Prebolda v Savinjsko-kozjanski arhitekturni regiji, v študiji posameznih stavb pa so bili vključeni primeri dobre prakse iz celotnega območja Slovenije. Hkrati so bili vsebinsko nadgrajeni Fistrovi »popisni kartoni«, ki sedaj bolj sistematično opredeljujejo lego stavbe znotraj naselja, ter njene volumetrične in ploskovne likovne elemente, ki so nosilci identitete. The article presents the redefinition of the continuity and visibility of the elements of building identity in recent buildings, in the context of the architectural regions and landscapes defined by Prof. Peter Fister in the 1990s. The mass of »self-build« interventions in the 1980s led to a break in the continuity of the transfer of traditional elements of the built heritage to new buildings - both at the level of the individual building and at the level of the settlement. The article describes the process of discovering and, with the help of modern software tools, evaluating those examples of recent construction where, despite the influence of various trends, it was possible to identify the preservation of traditional building identity elements. The research at the settlement and single building level was carried out in the area of Prebold in the Savinjsko-kozjanska architectural region, while the study of individual buildings included examples of good practice from the whole territory of Slovenia. At the same time, Fister’s »inventory cards« were upgraded in terms of content, which now more systematically define the position of the building within the settlement and its volumetric and planar visual elements, which are the carriers of identity. arhitektura identiteta stavbarstvo arhitekturne krajine arhitekturne regije raziskovanje architecture identity building architectural landscapes architectural regions research true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Članek v reviji 2024-04-05 11:44:20 2024-04-05 11:44:20 2025-02-07 13:21:29 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2023 0 0 Str. 40-47 Št. 11 2023 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 728.6:711.4(497.4Prebold) 2350-3637 10.15292/IU-CG.2023.11.040-047 189271299 RAZ_Svigelj_Ales_2023.pdf RAZ_Svigelj_Ales_2023.pdf 1 F6C77DC3DBD06B11D7C798F760842D2C 0a3ee478a822c13138a34a22565476509b93d7828bf9c8b81470efefdbcae942 12f0ed04-f331-11ee-afc9-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=182494 https://www.iu-cg.org/paper/?id=116&lang=si 0 00c47143-e534-11ef-b232-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=199258 Fakulteta za arhitekturo Igra ustvarjalnosti 0 0 0