20.500.12556/RUL-152776 "Inu koledniki ob božiči pojo" Trubarjeva interpretacija ljudske pesmi in ljudskega Trubarjev zapis začetka božične kolednice, vključen v Katekizem z dvema izlagama, se v pregledih zapisovanja ljudskopesemske dediščine navaja kot prvizapis slovenske ljudske pesmi. Vrednost tega zapisa pa ni samo v mejniku, ki ga zaznamuje: vsaj toliko kot sam zapis pesmi je vreden kontekst, v katerega je pesem umeščena. Izraža namreč presojo družbe, ki jo je Trubar v omenjenem delu v različnih pogledih zelo kritično predstavil, in pojasnjuje, katero družbeno plast je Trubar razumel kot prepoznavno za Slovence. Trubar je tako upravno kot socialno poznal težišča družbene moči in je to pokazal tudi z zapisom koledovanja, ki so ga poznala tudi mesta: tistih obrednih obhodov, ki jih je podeželje še ohranjalo, vendar družbeno niso bila več pomembna, ni niti omenjal. Osredotočil se je torej na družbeno opaznejšo obliko, ki jo je poznala tudi Ljubljana. To potrjuje spoznanje, da je identiteto svojih rojakov iskal med kmeti in med meščani. Njegov zapis koledovanja tako ni zanimiv samo zaradi pesmi, temveč kot opredelitev družbenega obzorja njegovega razumevanja "slovenstva". To ne zarisuje le Trubarjevega razumevanja ljudske pesmi, temveč problematizira obzorje stroke, ki se ji posveča. Overviews of folk-song heritage consider Primož Trubar's transcription of the beginning of a Christmas carol in his Katekizem z dvema izlagama (Catechism with Two Commentaries) to be the first transcription of a Slovenian folk song.However, this transcription is valuable not only because of this landmarkevent: the context in which this song is placed is as important as thetranscription itself. The context reflects a judgment of society that Trubar presented in his catechism from various viewpoints and with a great deal of criticism, and it clarifies which social class Trubar regarded as being most representative of the Slovenian nation. Trubar was well acquaintedwith both the administrative and social centers of power, which he also demonstrated through his note on caroling, which was also practiced in towns. He did not even mention the ritual processions that were still preserved in the countryside but had lost their social importance. Trubar thus focused on a socially more conspicuous form that was also known in Ljubljana. This confirms the fact that Trubar sought the identity of his fellow countrymen among both peasants and townsfolk. His mention of caroling is interesting not only because of the song, but also because it defines the social horizon of Trubar's perception of "Slovenian identity." This not only outlines Trubar's perception of folk song, but also problematizes the horizons of the discipline he dedicated himself to. etnologija ljudske pesmi jezikoslovje protestantizem kolednica obredni obhodi kontekst ljudstvo identiteta ethnology folk songs linguistics protestantism carol ritual processions context people identity true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Članek v reviji 2023-12-06 14:17:15 2023-12-06 14:17:19 2023-12-07 03:45:52 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2010 0 0 Str. 73-86 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 398.3:27(497.4)"15" 32072493 252810496 27-06_Klobcar.pdf 27-06_Klobcar.pdf 1 6BF2C0FE21B5B6106025401A741204E2 bef39866f56ca816faa0b06db63492b439df61def94fcb6d1750450eba2830c1 c8bc7be8-9439-11ee-ac6f-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=178417 https://centerslo.si/simpozij-obdobja/zborniki/obdobja-27/ 0 2c81e5da-943a-11ee-ac6f-0050569b8976 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=178424 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0