20.500.12556/RUL-146099 Spreminjanje parametrov spora v kazenskem postopku doktorska disertacija Modifying the dispute parameters in criminal procedure Doktorska disertacija obravnava možnosti za spreminjanje parametrov spora med kazenskim postopkom. Odgovarja na vprašanja, kako vplivajo na dinamiko med sodiščem in tožilcem, učinkovitost sojenja in položaj obdolženca. Prvo poglavje prikaže različne pristope k opredeljevanju predmeta kazenskega spora, ki so se oblikovali v različnih idejnih modelih kazenskega postopka. Temu sledi predstavitev okvira varstva pravic obrambe po spremembi parametrov spora, ki sta ga predvidela pravo Evropske Unije in sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice. Naslednja poglavja se osredotočajo na pristojnost tožilstva, da med sojenjem spremeni in razširi obtožbo, in pristojnosti sodišča, da spremeni dejstveno podlago in pravno opredelitev kaznivega dejanja iz tožilčevega obtožnega akta, kot obstajajo v slovenski pravni ureditvi. Osrednji deli drugega in tretjega poglavja temeljijo na analizi javno objavljenih sodnih odločb Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije in višjih sodišč. Analiza razkriva nekatera ustaljena stališča o spremembah dejanske in pravne podlage kazenskega postopka in daje vpogled v razmerja treh glavnih protagonistov kazenskega postopka, kot se kažejo skozi možnosti sprememb kazenske obtožbe. Zadnje poglavje predstavi rezultate empirične študije o pogostosti in značilnostih teh sprememb v slovenskem pravnem sistemu. Avtorica je analizirala vzorec pravnomočnih sodnih odločb za kazniva dejanja uboja, umora in tatvine. V sklepnem delu doktorska disertacija združuje ugotovitve vseh poglavij in odgovarja na vprašanje, kako veljavne možnosti za spreminjanje parametrov spora vplivajo na položaj obrambe ter na aktivnost tožilca in sodišča pri opredeljevanju predmeta kazenskega spora. The doctoral dissertation explores the possibilities of modifying the dispute parameters in criminal trials. It answers questions about how they impact the dynamic between the court and the prosecution, judicial efficiency and the position of the defence. The first chapter explores different approaches to defining the scope of the criminal trial in different conceptual models of criminal procedure. It then highlights the framework for safeguarding the rights of the defence following modification of the dispute parameters as established in the European Union law and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The following chapters focus on the power of the prosecution to amend and expand the criminal charge during the trial and the power of the court to modify the facts and legal qualification of the criminal offence set in the prosecution’s charges, as established under Slovenian law. The main parts of the second and third chapters are based on the analysis of the case law of the Slovenian Supreme Court and higher courts. The analysis reveals certain established views on the changes in the factual and legal basis of the criminal trial. It gives insight into the relationships of the three main protagonists of the criminal proceedings, as manifested through the powers to modify the charges. The final chapter presents the empirical study on the frequency and characteristics of these modifications in Slovenian criminal proceedings. The author analysed a dataset of final criminal judgments for the offences of manslaughter, murder and theft. In its conclusion, the doctoral dissertation synthesises the findings of all the chapters and addresses the question of how the existing possibilities of modifying the dispute parameters affect the position of the defence, the activity of the prosecution and the activity of the court in defining the subject matter of the criminal dispute. sprememba kazenske obtožbe iura novit curia obtožno načelo parametri spora pravna opredelitev kaznivega dejanja seznanitev z bistvom in vzroki obtožbe delitev funkcij pošteno sojenje amendment of the criminal charge iura novit curia accusatorial principle dispute parameters legal qualification of the criminal offence information on nature and cause of accusation separation of functions fair trial true false false [L. Briški] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Slovenija; Doktorsko delo/naloga 2023-05-19 09:00:05 2023-05-19 09:00:14 2023-05-22 13:32:07 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2023 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 254 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 343.1(497.4)(043.3) 110666 152945923 12494.pdf 12494.pdf 1 6603FAACB481F6834A1BE49B75E9220B 3aa6e9425ef93a1f32083bb91c2ff3a11a044a9ef88e3caea8ac4d995b52f087 8fe7f37e-f612-11ed-a314-00155dcfd717 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=169214 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0