20.500.12556/RUL-142411 Optimizing forest landscape composition for multiple ecosystem services based on uncertain stakeholder preferences Determining the desirable composition of a forested landscape and its associated ecosystem services (ES) is challenging because the solutions must reconcile the preferences of various forest stakeholders and account for uncertain data. By combining multi-objective robust optimization with an online survey of forest professionals in Slovenia (n = 130) and forest professionals, forest scientists, nature conservationists and forest owners in Germany (n = 649) about optimal forest landscape composition, we derived compromise portfolios of forest types. These portfolios minimize the trade-offs between five ES (stopping avalanches, carbon storage, recreation, timber production and regulating flows of water), and account for the varying capacity of eight forest types to supply ES. The resulting optimized forest landscape compositions always comprised at least two forest types. In both countries, uneven-aged native deciduous and conifer mixed stands were prominent in the optimized portfolios. In Germany, however, the optimized portfolio also contained exotic species in mixtures, whereas forest stands without active management were notable for several ES in Slovenia. Unmanaged forest stands were also selected in the forest composition optimized for nature conservationists in Germany: the nature conservationists' portfolio diverged strongly from those of the other stakeholders. Our results illustrate that diversified forested landscapes provide multiple ES, but also secure the provision of a single ES when accounting for uncertainty. The optimal forest compositions obtained by multi-objective robust optimization are a starting point for participatory planning approaches to identify the most socially acceptable strategies for adapting forest management to an uncertain future. robust optimization multi-objective decision-making long-term forest composition forest stand type robustna optimizacija večciljno odločanje gozdni sestoji true false true Angleški jezik Slovenski jezik Neznano 2022-11-07 14:26:06 2022-11-07 14:26:13 2022-11-08 03:56:53 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2022 0 0 11 str. art. 159393 part 3 2022 0000-00-00 PostprintKoncna Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2022-01-01 2024-10-27 630*22 1879-1026 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159393 128328451 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969722064920 1 a91034db-5e9f-11ed-9c94-00155dcfd717 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=163759 RAZ_Chreptun_Claudia_2022.pdf RAZ_Chreptun_Claudia_2022.pdf 1 6CA4DAA2FB19DB74C0A7E9CFC418DFD6 08ebe0d715ae31013a1a5cac377e1a7ab2c64e31558b34351c37bb75ccb5491d c778db6c-5e9f-11ed-9c94-00155dcfd717 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=163760 Biotehniška fakulteta 0 0 0