20.500.12556/RUL-141576 Schleglova politična filozofija Schlegel's Political Philosophy Pričujoče besedilo se ukvarja s Schleglovo politično filozofijo, izpeljano iz njegove teorije ironije. Ironija je bistveni del romantičnega odnosa do sveta, kot se kaže v t. i. »progresivni poeziji« ter odprtosti in fragmentarnosti romantične biti in jezika. Toda ključen kritik koncepta ironije, Hegel, njeno igro nedokončanosti označi za samovoljnega subjekta oz. za zlo, ki uničuje skupnost, romantike pa razume kot protipol svoje spekulativne filozofije. Po drugi strani pa je Kant, kljub racionalizmu transcendentalnega idealizma, z estetsko sodbo o lepem in sublimnem veliko bližje romantikom, saj je prvo sodbo mogoče razumeti kot podlago intersubjektivnosti, potrebne za igro ironije, drugo pa kot tisto »nikoli spoznavno«, ki to igro sploh omogoča. Tako ironija ne onemogoča nastanka v – najširšem možnem pomenu – politične skupnosti. Taka skupnost vendar temelji na pluralizmu lokalnih narativov in decentraliziranosti, v čemer je treba iskati povezavo s poststrukturalizmom in postmodernizmom. S tem je Heglova kritika ovržena. Še več, daljnosežna povezava med romantiko ter poststrukturalizmom in postmodernizmom kot obzorji ironične skupnosti, kot se bo izkazalo, korenini ravno v njej. The following paper discovers Schlegel’s political philosophy derived from his concept of irony as the crucial segment of romantic ontological perception of the world. Romantic irony manifests particularly in the so-called “progressive poetry”, openness, and fragmentarity of romantic essence and language. The leading critique of such concept of irony is Hegel’s. It considers its playful openness and inexhaustibility an evil, arbitrary and isolated subject who undermines any possibility of community, based on universality of law. Nevertheless, Kant and his judgment of beautiful and sublime are of much closer proximity to romantic irony than Hegel’s speculative idealism – the former with Arendt’s further concept of intersubjectivity, essential for ironic playfulness, and the latter with its “revealing” of limits to our knowledge which in turn enables the game of irony. Hence, romantic irony does not disable any formation of political – in its broadest sense – community. An ironic community, that is to say, is founded on pluralism of local narratives and dispersion which bring us to 20th century poststructuralist and postmodernist paradigms. Hegel’s critique is then refuted. Furthermore, it will be argued in this paper that the very same critique represents the ground on which a far-fetched correlation between romanticism and postmodernism plus poststructuralism, respectively, as the horizons of ironic community, is actually based. romantika ironija subjektiviteta fragmentarnost zlo intersubjektivnost sublimno jezik postmodernizem poststrukturalizem skupnost romanticism irony subjectivity fragmentarity evil intersubjectivity sublime language postmodernism poststructuralism community true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2022-10-01 07:48:28 2022-10-01 07:48:30 2022-10-21 10:43:32 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2022 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 509486 126583555 24686.pdf 24686.pdf 1 3ED70B5B3D8BCF33B7854607B17167E9 9bd03d6c67c807d662f3ce48f99ca8c04ea1fa008c365d164eeea52fd0440256 a984c9a5-414c-11ed-9c94-00155dcfd717 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=162655 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0