20.500.12556/RUL-141416 Goreči menih: Telo kot kraj protesta, protest kot branje telesa telo kot kraj protesta, protest kot branje telesa The Monk on Fire: Body as a Site of Protest, Protest as a Reading of the Body diplomsko delo V diplomskem delu preverjam tezo, da je protest lahko razumljen kot branje telesa. Pri tem izhajam iz študije primera samosežiga mahajana budističnega meniha Thich Quang Duca iz leta 1963 v Saigonu. Izpostavim nekaj odzivov na ta dogodek in jih kontrastiram s pismom meniha Thich Nhat Hanha, ki je zavrnil, da bi bil samosežig protest ali samomor. Ta ontološka diskrepanca je motivirala nove raziskovalne nastavke. Da bi jo pokazal kot preučljivo, jo tematiziram z vpeljavo pojmovnega para vidno-nevidno. Predstavim razpravo Maria Blaserja, ki naslovi polje epistemologije in ontologije ter komentira nekaj temeljnih teoretskih pristopov, kot sta ontološki obrat in kozmopolitika. Odgovarjam, da je telo lahko dober informator o sebi in o dogajanju, v katerega je vpeto. Telo je multiplo, niso pa vsi njegovi vidiki enako dostopni. Ugotavljam, da so nevidne – na primer ontološke – vsebine nekega dogodka pogosto spregledane, kar pripisujem tudi naravi fotografije kot medija. Po drugi strani je vidno (natančneje: vizualno) v študiji primera zelo komunikativno, a je takšno branje telesa pogosto bolj redukcionistično. Z diplomskim delom pozivam k metodološki refleksiji raziskovalnega objekta, kot možno rešitev pa predlagam etnografijo vidnega in nevidnega. In my diploma thesis, I test the claim that protest can be understood as a reading of the body. My starting point is a case study of the self-immolation of the Mahayana Buddhist monk Thich Quang Duc in 1963, Saigon. I highlight some of the reactions to this event and contrast them with the letter of the monk Thich Nhat Hanh, who denied that the self-immolation was a protest or suicide. This ontological discrepancy motivated new research approaches. In order to show it as studyable, I thematize it by introducing the conceptual pair visible-invisible. I present a discussion by Mario Blaser that addresses the field of epistemology and ontology, also commenting on some fundamental theoretical approaches such as the ontological turn and cosmopolitics. I conclude that the body can be a good informant about itself and the events in which it is involved. The body is multiple, but not all its aspects are equally accessible. I find that the invisible – for example ontological – contents of an event are often overlooked, which I partially attribute to the nature of photography as a medium. On the other hand, the visible (more precisely the visual) is highly communicative in the case study, but such a reading of the body is often more reductionist. With the dissertation, I call for a methodological reflection on the research object, and as a possible solution I propose an ethnography of the visible and the invisible. politika kozmopolitika ontološki obrat etnografija teorija reprezentacije politics cosmopolitics ontological turn ethnography representation theory true false false [L. Benedičič] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2022-09-29 08:17:13 2022-09-29 08:17:15 2022-11-16 14:14:14 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2022 0 Ljubljana 0 Ljubljana 32 f. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 316 508722 129651971 20113.pdf 20113.pdf 1 EDD40B295726B7A521EE56EAAE180AFC f51479358dbff95ee3f769ed509278a4d63909a3869dcc8256308c4f712311cd 5b410695-3fbe-11ed-9c94-00155dcfd717 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=162468 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0