20.500.12556/RUL-140133 Dreyfusova kritika umetne inteligence Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence Diplomsko delo predstavlja Dreyfusovo kritiko umetne inteligence, pri čemer si za izhodišče postavlja zadnjo verzijo knjige Huberta Dreyfusa z naslovom Česar računalniki še vedno ne zmorejo: Kritika umetnega razuma. Delo najprej predstavi definicijo umetne inteligence, ki ji sledi kratka zgodovina umetne inteligence, kjer sta predstavljena dva zgodovinska pristopa k umetni inteligenci. Temu sledi predstavitev štirih domnev raziskav umetne inteligence, ki jih je Dreyfus kritiziral zaradi neupravičenega optimizma. Domneve si sledijo od biološke, preko psihološke in epistemološke, do ontološke. V sklopu diplomske naloge so predstavljene tudi Dreyfusove alternative tradicionalnim domnevam. Prva se posveča poudarjanju vloge človeškega telesa pri inteligentnem obnašanju, druga fenomenu urejenega delovanja, ne da bi se le-to sklicevalo na pravila, in zadnja na pomen situacije, kot funkcije človeških potreb. Na koncu se posvetim pomenu kritike danes, v kontekstu razmerja med simbolnim in konekcionističnim pristopom nevronskih mrež v umetni inteligenci in danes še vedno relevantnemu problemu konteksta. Undergraduate thesis attempts to presents Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence, focusing on the latest version of Hubert Dreyfus's book What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Intelligence. Thesis first presents a definition of artificial intelligence, followed by a brief history of artificial intelligence, where two historical approaches to artificial intelligence are presented. This is followed by a presentation of four artificial intelligence assumptions that Dreyfus criticized for unjustified optimism. Assumptions follow each other from biological, through psychological and epistemological, to ontological. As part of the diploma thesis, Dreyfus' alternatives to traditional assumptions are also presented. The first is dedicated to emphasizing the role of the human body in intelligent behavior, the second to the phenomenon of orderly action without reference to the rules, and the last to the meaning of the situation as a function of human needs. Finally, I turn to the importance of criticism today, in the context of the relationship between the symbolic and connectionist approaches in artificial intelligence and the still-relevant problem of context today. Hubert Dreyfus umetna inteligenca simbolni pristop konekcionistični pristop kontekst. Hubert Dreyfus artificial intelligence symbolic approach connectionist approach context. true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2022-09-11 07:46:17 2022-09-11 07:46:20 2022-09-16 04:13:30 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2022 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 504325 22564.pdf 22564.pdf 1 01845F4D839232210D713BE093B43874 c5f6436a12bce75fdbd0edda2e9dde530e79cee2996126a11d0804a55a905c5d 0093f5c8-3195-11ed-92af-00155dcfd717 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=160804 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0