20.500.12556/RUL-134328 Odvzem prostosti v prekrškovnem pravu Deprivation of liberty in misdemeanor law V prekrškovnem pravu smo kazen zapora kot eno izmed sankcij za prekršek poznali do leta 2005. Po tem letu je s sprejemom novega Zakona o prekrških nastopila sprememba prekrškovne zakonodaje in s tem opustitev kazni zapora. Bistveno novost je predstavljal uklonilni zapor, o (ne)ustavnosti katerega je šele več let po njegovi uveljavitvi odločalo Ustavno sodišče, čeprav so se v teoriji že od samega začetka pojavljale dileme glede (ne)ustavnosti tega instituta. Kljub temu, da Ustavno sodišče s svojo odločitvijo uklonilnemu zaporu ni popolnoma zaprlo vrat, se je zakonodajalec odločil, da bo ta institut v celoti opustil ter reformiral celoten sistem za primere, ko storilec v določenem roku ne plača izrečene globe in stroškov postopka. Temeljno novost v zakonodaji je predstavljal nov način izvršitve neplačane in neizterljive globe z njeno spremembo v nadomestni zapor, ki ga v veljavni ureditvi poznamo še dandanes. Magistrsko diplomsko delo tako prikazuje razvoj vloge odvzema prostosti v prekrškovnem pravu, in sicer od zaporne kazni kot ene od sankcij, do uklonilnega zapora kot načina prisiljevanja k plačilu globe, vse do nadomestnega zapora kot oblike izvršitve neplačane in neizvršljive globe. Kot stalnici v prekrškovnem pravu sta predstavljeni tudi dve temeljni obliki odvzema prostosti med samim postopkom, ki sta namenjeni izvedbi postopka (pridržanje in privedba). In misdemeanor law, imprisonment was known as one of the sanctions until 2005. After that year, with the adoption of the new Minor Offences Act, there was a change in misdemeanor legislation which led to the abolition of imprisonment. An essential novelty was the remand prison the (un) constitutionality of which was decided by the Constitutional Court only several years after its entry into force, although in theory dilemmas arose from the very beginning regarding the (un) constitutionality of this institute. Although the Constitutional Court did not completely close the door to remand prison, the legislator decided to abandon this institute altogether and reform the entire system for cases where the perpetrator does not pay the fine and costs of the proceedings within a set time limit. A fundamental novelty in the legislation was a new way of enforcing the unpaid and uncollectible fine by changing it into a alternative imprisonment, which is still known in the current regulations. The Master's thesis thus illustrates the development of the role of deprivation of liberty in misdemeanor law, from imprisonment as one of the sanctions, to remand prison as a means coercion to pay a fine, to alternative imprisonment as a form of execution of unpaid and unenforceable fine. Two basic forms of deprivation of liberty during the proceedings themselves, which are intended for the conduct of the proceedings (detention and transfer), are also presented as constants in misdemeanor law. prekrškovno pravo prekršek pravica do osebne svobode odvzem prostosti zaporna kazen uklonilni zapor nadomestni zapor misdemeanor law misdemeanor right to personal liberty deprivation of liberty imprisonment remand prison alternative imprisonment true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2022-01-06 09:00:02 2022-01-06 09:00:07 2022-09-13 03:54:34 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2022 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 102193 96322307 8539.pdf 8539.pdf 1 264B1F538BBDC5C65132FFC1186130A4 6ae63939ea8090296b0f3af317688c0d6bb4426c953dda208c049194cd7e5d22 7f130f26-6ec6-11ec-abdb-00155dcfd717 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=152723 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0