20.500.12556/RUL-109045 M. Luter in J. Krizostom v paradigmi paleoortodoksije pistologija Pisma Hebrejcem M. Luther and J. Chrysostom in the paradigm of paleo-orthodoxy pistology in the Epistle to the Hebrews Članek analizira vlogo patrističnih avtorjev pri oblikovanju misli Martina Lutra (1483–1546). Prikaže očrt večplastnega in ambivalentnega Lutrovega odnosa do patristike, kar se pokaže tudi s konkretnim primerom analize Lutrove recepcije Krizostomovih (ok. 349–407) 34 homilij In Epistolam ad Hebraeos. Lutrova interpretacija problema odnosa med vero in deli se preko raziskave recepcije Krizostoma pokaže kot nezadostna in omejena. Krizostomova pistologija Pisma Hebrejcem je celostna in uravnotežena, Luter pa jo subjektivno podredi svojemu miselnemu kontekstu. Rešitev problema predlagamo v konceptu t. i. paleoortodoksije metodističnega teologa Thomasa C. Odena (1931–2016), saj je v okviru reformiranih teologov vodilni mislec, ki poudarja pomembnost patristično-ekumenskega konsenzualnega teološkega mišljenja. Odnos med vero in deli lahko šele ob iskrenem soočenju s patrističnimi poudarki spet zasije v organski povezanosti in postane možnost iskanja ekumenskega soglasja danes Article analyses the role of patristic authors in the shaping of Luther's thought (1483– 1546). It reveals his multifaced and ambivalent attitude toward patristics, which is seen on the case of Luther’s reception of Chrysostom’s (c. 349–407) 34 homilies In Epistolam ad Hebraeos. Luther’s interpretation of the problem between the works and faith is considered inadequate and unsatistactory. Chrysostom’s pistology of the Epistle to the Hebrews is holistic and balanced, which Luther subdues for the purpose of his own theological concepts. We propose the solution for this problem in the concept of paleo-orthodoxy that was built by Methodist theologian Thomas C. Oden (1931–2016) in which he emphasizes the importance of patristic-ecumenical consensual theological thinking. The relation between faith and works can shine in the organic coherence, through the sincere consideration of patristic sources, and becomes the possibility of seeking the ecumenical consensus even today. vera patristika dela ekumenizem dialog faith patristics works ecumenism dialogue true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Članek v reviji 2019-08-19 21:35:47 2019-08-19 21:35:47 2022-08-21 03:39:36 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2017 0 0 Str. 169-182 št. 1/2 Letn. 72 2017 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 27-675-9 2335-4127 URN:NBN:SI:doc-B626QBVI 10736899 268194560 RAZ_Bogataj_Jan_Dominik_i2017.pdf RAZ_Bogataj_Jan_Dominik_i2017.pdf 1 636F0D02636B26CF0851CAB1CC81C588 b9623512dac8ef00e5c1f9912fe579c994b05bb2a8547a0f136eefe4ddd3e608 c3280f80-a1b6-11eb-a523-00155dcfd717 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=120404 https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-B626QBVI 1 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=120405 http://www.teof.uni-lj.si/uploads/File/Edinost/72/Bogataj.pdf 1 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=120407 Teološka fakulteta Edinost in dialog 0 0 0