20.500.12556/RUL-107701 Porotno sojenje v primerjalnopravni perspektivi: učinkovita participacija javnosti v zatonu Jury Trials from a Comparative Legal Perspective: Effective Public Participation in Decline Magistrska naloga obravnava trend upadanja uporabe porote v sodnih postopkih v Angliji in Združenih državah Amerike. Porota predstavlja edino obliko neposredne laične participacije v sodni veji oblasti. Kljub veliki prepoznavnosti instituta v širši javnosti, se le ta v praksi uporablja v manj kot enem odstotku primerov. K zatonu porotnega sojenja prispeva širok spekter dejavnikov. Kot njegovo glavno slabost se največkrat omenja dolgotrajnost in finančno potratnost. Stranke postopka se zato pogosteje odločajo za alternativne oblike reševanja sporov, ki pa pogosto ne nudijo enakovredne poglobljene obravnave primera. Zaradi negotovosti izida, zvišanja minimalnih sankcij in prigovarjanj tožilstva, obtoženci v kazenskih postopkih vsepogosteje namesto sojenja izberejo dogovor s tožilstvom. Prav tako stranke kompleksnih civilnih sporov pogosto raje sklenejo izvensodno poravnavo, kot da odločanje o svoji usodi prepustijo skupini ljudi, ki nima za postopek ustreznih strokovnih znanj. Spreminja pa se tudi vloga sodnikov in odvetnikov v postopku, saj jih zaradi številčnosti zadev vodi predvsem želja po čim hitrejši razrešitvi primera in čim manjšem tveganju. Za ponovno oživitev instituta so tako nujne reforme, ki bi porotno sojenje prilagodile razmeram 21. stoletja. Skozi obravnavo razlogov za zaton in preučevanje možnih reform, bom poskušala potrditi tezo, da je porotno sojenje vredno ohraniti, saj predstavlja nenadomestljiv način laičnega sodelovanja in odločanja ter skrbi, da so pravna pravila in odločitve sodišč v skladu z družbenimi normami in pravičnostjo. The thesis explores the decline of jury trial in England and the United States of America. The jury represents the only form of direct lay participation whitin the judicial branch. The institute is used in less than one percent of trials, despite the fact that it is well known among the general public. The downfall of jury use in trials can be attributed to a wide range of factors. Its most frequently mentioned weaknesses are the longevity and financial wastefulness. Hence, more and more parties opt for alternative dispute resolutions, which often do not provide the equivalent indepth examination of the case. Due to the uncertainty of the outcome, the increase in the mandatory minimum sentencing and pressures from the prosecution side, the defendants in criminal trials are more inclined to accept a plea deal over facing a jury in trial. Likewise, parties in complex civil trials prefer to reach an agreement over letting a group of people, without necessary expertise, decide their faith. The role of judges and lawyers is also changing as, due to the abundance of cases, they are primarily driven by the desire to resolve the case as quickly as possible with minimum risk involved. Reforms, which will bring jury trials to the 21st century, are crucial for its revival. Through the discussion of the reasons for the decline and the study of possible reforms, I will try to confirm the thesis that the jury trial is worth preserving, since it is an irreplaceable way of lay participation and decision making, which ensures that the legal rules and decisions of the courts are in accordance with social norms and justice. porota Anglija ZDA porotno sojenje laična participacija porotni sistem reforma porotnega sojenja zaton porotnega sojenja jury England United States of America jury trial lay participation jury trial reform decline of jury trial true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2019-05-15 07:45:27 2019-05-15 07:45:36 2022-08-19 03:50:38 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2019 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 86852 16765009 4138.pdf 4138.pdf 1 373D3FBAC4F05B717F032AEB2FD21891 7ad7b0aa80aecbb19d94f1fdf96d1b1620a9389b33f95b4394810c4ec7ac55aa 7e1f2a29-a1b6-11eb-a523-00155dcfd717 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=118583 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0