<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>From flat to structured</dc:title><dc:creator>Poredoš,	Primož	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Silva-Oelker,	Gerardo	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Trajkovski,	Dejan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Wilson Marangattil,	Higgins	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ali,	Abdallah Y.M.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Žižak,	Tej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zavrl,	Eva	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Arkar,	Ciril	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Medved,	Sašo	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Domjan,	Suzana	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>radiative sky cooling materials</dc:subject><dc:subject>atmospheric water harvesting</dc:subject><dc:subject>hotspot cooling</dc:subject><dc:subject>heat and mass transfer</dc:subject><dc:subject>ray tracing</dc:subject><dc:subject>numerical simulations</dc:subject><dc:subject>optical characteristics of materials</dc:subject><dc:description>Radiative cooling has been developed for two largely separate functions: passive thermal management and atmospheric water harvesting (AWH). Combining them on a single surface under an imposed heat load is intrinsically difficult, as hotspot cooling raises the emitter temperature, whereas condensation requires sustained sub-dew-point regions. Here we establish, to our knowledge, a previously unreported geometry-driven co-functional regime in which a localized hotspot is coupled to an extended planar or pyramidal radiative emitter. Lateral heat spreading creates a warm, dry zone near the hotspot while preserving cooler peripheral regions for dew formation, allowing the same passive platform to reject heat and harvest water simultaneously. We combine angle-resolved optical characterization, raytracing, coupled heat and mass transfer modelling, and outdoor experiments. At a hotspot heat flux of 1021 W m$^{−2}$, the largest planar emitter and 45° pyramidal emitter retain dew fluxes of 9.3 and 7.9 g m▫$^{−2}$▫ h▫$^{−1}$▫, respectively, while lowering the near-hotspot temperature by more than 45 °C relative to a non-concentrated control. At 1500 W m$^{−2}$, the same architectures keep the hotspot below 20 °C, whereas the control approaches 85 °C. Finally, an experiment-calibrated global assessment further identifies where this regime is climatically accessible. These results provide a general framework for the passive co-management of localized heat and atmospheric water harvesting.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-10-21 10:09:59</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>190055</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 536.24:628.116</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 1754-5692</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d6ee04674f</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 301807875</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
