<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Knowing is not enough</dc:title><dc:creator>Radovan,	Marko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Makovec Radovan,	Danijela	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>higher education</dc:subject><dc:subject>GenAI</dc:subject><dc:subject>self-reported GenAI use</dc:subject><dc:subject>student support needs</dc:subject><dc:subject>critical–responsible orientation</dc:subject><dc:subject>generative AI</dc:subject><dc:description>Generative AI tools are spreading rapidly through higher education, yet relationships among students’ perceived familiarity with GenAI, self-reported use, support needs, and critical–responsible orientation remain insufficiently understood. We surveyed 449 students from four Slovenian faculties of education and arts. Perceived familiarity with GenAI was measured using a single self-assessment item rather than a test of knowledge or competence. Critical–responsible orientation was operationalized as the importance students assigned to nine ethical and societal issues; it did not measure observed responsible behavior. Perceived familiarity with GenAI was positively but modestly associated with the frequency, breadth, and diversity of self-reported learning-related GenAI use. Descriptively, students with lower perceived familiarity reported greater support needs across all five areas, while responsible-use guidance was widely requested in both groups. Perceived familiarity with GenAI did not significantly predict critical–responsible orientation; age showed a small positive association. Among the 196 respondents who reported using GenAI for learning, perceived familiarity was the only significant predictor of the number of learning-related purposes; perceived instructional and institutional support and critical–responsible orientation were not independently associated with the outcome. These findings distinguish perceived familiarity with GenAI, self-reported use, support needs, and critical–responsible orientation as related but non-equivalent dimensions of GenAI readiness. Higher education institutions should provide curriculum-based support that combines practical GenAI skills with critical evaluation and attention to responsible use.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-10-13 04:16:07</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>189687</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 378</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2227-7102</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.3390/educsci16081259</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 294776323</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
