<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Incidental learning from science journalism</dc:title><dc:creator>Ameseder,	Christian	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Devetak,	Iztok	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Skubic,	Darija	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>incidental learning</dc:subject><dc:subject>narrative science journalism</dc:subject><dc:subject>cognitive load</dc:subject><dc:subject>comprehension</dc:subject><dc:subject>situational interest</dc:subject><dc:subject>storytelling</dc:subject><dc:description>Austrian non-experts in health sciences often lack the scientific knowledge to make informed decisions that affect their daily lives and society as  a  whole.  In  general,  their  interest  in  current  scientific  knowledge  is  low, so it is unlikely that they will actively seek out information. Adult non-experts  therefore  need  to  acquire  relevant  scientific  information  incidentally,  e.g.,  by  reading  journalistic  articles.  Journalistic  articles  traditionally follow an inverted pyramid structure, presenting the most important information first, while narratives unfold events chronologically with intentionally acting characters. Journalistic science narratives provide information that is usually missing in inverted pyramids. This additional  information  may  increase  situational  interest  in  journalistic  science narratives. Most people are confronted with narratives more often than with explanatory texts in everyday life and can therefore process them better. Due to the linear structure, relevant information elements are  automatically  activated  at  the  same  time,  which  further  facilitates  processing. An online study in the context of online science journalism on  nutrition  topics  was  conducted  in  Austria  with  461  adult  non-experts  in  health  sciences  recruited  via  online  platforms.  The  dependent  variables  comprehension,  cognitive  load  and  situational  interest  were  investigated using a multipletier test and self-reports. The results indicate significantly higher comprehension and general situational interest and significantly lower cognitive load after reading journalistic science narratives  compared  to  inverted  pyramids.  However,  situational  interest  in  journalistic  science  narratives  was  significantly  lower  after  participants had read the first paragraph. It then increased and was significantly higher than that for inverted pyramids for the rest of the article. Therefore,  journalistic  science  narratives  with  a  strictly  chronological structure should be used with caution. When initial situational interest is low, individuals may stop reading before they have enough information to fully comprehend the content. In addition, higher situational interest is correlated with a lower perception of cognitive load.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-10-12 13:01:20</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>189677</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 070:001</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2232-2647</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.26529/cepsj.1899</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 223814403</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
