<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Synergising academia and industry</dc:title><dc:creator>Temel,	Serdal	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Chipulu,	Max	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Howells,	Jeremy	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dabić,	Marina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>business schools</dc:subject><dc:subject>enterprises</dc:subject><dc:subject>knowledge transfer</dc:subject><dc:subject>innovations</dc:subject><dc:subject>labour efficiency</dc:subject><dc:subject>Turkey</dc:subject><dc:subject>university–business collaboration</dc:subject><dc:subject>innovation</dc:subject><dc:subject>human capital development</dc:subject><dc:description>Purpose – This study examines how two collaboration channels – education and training and research and development (R&amp;D) – within university–business collaboration (UBC) are associated with firms’ innovation, commercialisation, talent access and efficiency outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – Using a nationwide survey of 4,188 academics and multilevel logit models (GLMM), we estimate the odds of four firm-level outcomes and report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals to assess the magnitude and significance of UBC effects. Findings – Collaborative R&amp;D initiatives significantly enhance the commercialisation of academic inventions and the efficiency of business operations. Engagements in education- and training-oriented UBC are positively associated with product and process innovation and firms’ access to student talent, underscoring the human– capital dimension of collaboration. The results highlight the complementary roles of R&amp;D and education-based collaboration in fostering innovation and organisational performance, while indicating that some structural and relational barriers continue to constrain UBC effectiveness. Research limitations/implications – Outcomes are reported by academics and anchored in documented project outputs; hence, the industry-level effects are assessed from the perspective and perceptions of the academic respondents rather than from direct firm data. We therefore acknowledge the single-source nature of the dataset and discuss potential implications for interpretation and generalisability. Originality/value – This paper provides one of the first large-scale analyses of individual-level human capital in UBC within the Turkish context, distinguishing between education and training and R&amp;D channels and linking them to specific firm-level outcomes through a multilevel modelling approach.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-06-23 19:07:57</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>184002</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 658</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 1460-1060</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-08-2025-1025</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 278130947</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
