<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>The impact of lighting parameters for pedestrian areas on their safety and reassurance</dc:title><dc:creator>Wei,	Lanlan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kobav,	Matej Bernard	(Mentor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>Street lighting</dc:subject><dc:subject>energy-efficient</dc:subject><dc:subject>pedestrian behaviour</dc:subject><dc:subject>pedestrian safety</dc:subject><dc:subject>obstacle detection</dc:subject><dc:subject>lighting design</dc:subject><dc:subject>minimum illuminance</dc:subject><dc:subject>urban lighting planning</dc:subject><dc:subject>optimized lighting design</dc:subject><dc:subject>nighttime space</dc:subject><dc:subject>nighttime visibility</dc:subject><dc:subject>reassurance</dc:subject><dc:subject>plateau effect</dc:subject><dc:subject>adaptive lighting</dc:subject><dc:description>Public lighting determines night-time visibility in urban spaces and influences pedestrians’
behaviour at night. Although traditional engineering standards focus on average illuminance,
luminance, and spectral power distribution, these metrics often fail to take into account the
specific behavioural needs of pedestrians. This study assessed objective functional
capabilities related to obstacle detection, as well as subjective psychological states
(particularly a sense of safety and preferences). By combining virtual simulations with field
experiments in Ljubljana, Slovenia, this study establishes a new evidence-based foundation
for urban lighting applications.
The methodology comprises three distinct studies: a virtual preference survey (N=116), a field study using the “day–dark” reassurance methodology (N=35), and an on-site controlled
obstacle detection experiment (N=56) with 14 distinct lighting conditions. Findings from the
preference survey indicate that spatial “continuity,” defined as the perceived connectivity of
lighting across the visual field, is an important factor influencing user preference. In the onsite study, minimum horizontal illuminance emerged as the most effective predictor of
pedestrian reassurance. To bridge the perceptual gap between daytime and nighttime safety
(defined as a 0.5 difference on a 5-point scale), the results established a required minimum
horizontal illuminance of approximately 1.80 lx approx 0.15 cd/m²). These performance based trials revealed a distinct plateau effect in visibility. In the third experiment, obstacle
detection accuracy stagnated once maximum and average illuminances reached 6.70 lx and
2.76 lx, respectively. These findings suggest that current strategies focused on maximising
average illuminance yield diminishing returns in terms of safety improvements, and
unnecessarily increasing energy consumption. Optimal nighttime lighting application requires site-specific approaches, with lighting spatial distribution and minimum illuminance
thresholds taking priority. These empirical indicators provide a technical basis for refining
international documents and standards such as CIE 115 and EN 13201, thereby promoting the development of urban lighting planning in a human-centred and adaptive direction. This
approach effectively balances the requirements of pedestrian safety and ecological
conservation.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-05-13 14:05:16</dc:date><dc:type>Doktorsko delo/naloga</dc:type><dc:identifier>182482</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>VisID: 60986</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
