<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Teachers’ perceptions of evidence-informed practice</dc:title><dc:creator>Suárez-Rivarola,	Cecilia Inés	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>López-Crespo,	Saida	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Díaz-Vicario,	Anna	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>evidence-informed practice</dc:subject><dc:subject>inclusion</dc:subject><dc:subject>research use</dc:subject><dc:subject>teacher</dc:subject><dc:subject>teaching practice</dc:subject><dc:description>The  research-informed  approach  is  attracting  increasing  interest  in  European  and  national  education  policy,  as  well  as  in  local  education  policy in Catalonia (Spain). Previous studies have revealed that it is associated with multiple benefits for improving equity and inclusion. This is particularly relevant in the case of vulnerable children: teachers’ use of research can facilitate more inclusive practices, benefiting the learning outcomes of such children. In the present paper, we analyse teachers’  perceptions  of  the  importance  of  evidence-informed  practices  according  to  the  level  of  complexity  of  the  schools  where  they  work.  In  doing so, we applied an ad-hoc survey to 314 early childhood, primary and secondary teachers working in high-, medium- and low-complexity schools  in  Catalonia.  The  measure  of  school  complexity,  as  defined  by  the Catalan administration, classifies schools and distributes resources according  to  socioeconomic  and  administrative  complexity  indicators.  Descriptive  and  comparative  analyses  were  conducted.  The  findings  revealed  that  although  teachers  acknowledge  the  value  of  educational  research, its use is shaped by organisational conditions and the broader school context. Low-complexity schools provide more favourable environments  for  the  systematic  use  of  evidence,  highlighting  both  an  opportunity and a challenge to enhance these conditions in more complex settings. Nevertheless, differences across schools by complexity level are generally subtle, with only a few statistically significant variations. Time for training and regular practice evaluation emerge as key factors for implementing teachers’ evidence-informed practice across all school types.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-04-08 10:38:10</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>181453</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 37.01</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2232-2647</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.26529/cepsj.2196</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 274009859</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
