<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Indirect, machine learning-based suicide risk screening</dc:title><dc:creator>Rus Prelog,	Polona	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rojnić Kuzman,	Martina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Matić,	Teodora	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pregelj,	Peter	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Medved,	Sara	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bjedov,	Sarah	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rojnic Palavra,	Irena	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Petek Eric,	Anamarija	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Drmic,	Stipe	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vidovic,	Domagoj	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sadikov,	Aleksander	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>machine learning</dc:subject><dc:subject>mass screening</dc:subject><dc:subject>risk assessment</dc:subject><dc:subject>suicidal ideation</dc:subject><dc:description>Background: Suicide is a major public health challenge requiring early detection of suicidal ideation (SI). Traditional direct questioning methods suffer from stigma and disclosure bias, failing to identify many at-risk individuals. While machine learning (ML) models show promise, most lack external validation. Indirect screening, using psychosocial data rather than direct SI questions, offers a scalable alternative. This study aimed to externally validate an indirect, ML-based SI screening tool. We tested if a model trained on a Slovenian general population sample retained predictive accuracy when applied to an independent Croatian sample during a period of societal stress (pandemic and earthquakes), assessing performance across age and gender subgroups. 
Methods: A logistic regression model was trained on a Slovenian sample (N = 2,989) and validated on a Croatian sample (N = 2,364). The model used only indirect predictors, including sociodemographics, life satisfaction, behavioral changes, and Brief COPE subscales. The target outcome was the presence of SI (SIDAS score &gt; 0). Performance was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). 
Results: The model demonstrated strong external validity on the entire Croatian sample, achieving an AUROC of 0.80. Performance remained robust across subgroups: males (AUROC = 0.83), females (AUROC = 0.79), younger adults (AUROC = 0.77), and older adults (AUROC = 0.81). Self-blame, behavioral disengagement, and relationship dissatisfaction were key predictors. 
Conclusions: An indirect, ML-based screening tool can reliably identify SI risk in the general population. The model demonstrated strong cross-national transferability and resilience during a societal crisis, proving it is a feasible and valid strategy for population-level prevention.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-04-07 10:32:24</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>181423</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 616.89</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 1778-3585</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2026.10166</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 271787011</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
