Improving the histologic detection of DSA-negative antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantsHidalgo, Luis G. (Avtor) Arnol, Miha (Avtor) Kojc, Nika (Avtor) Večerić-Haler, Željka (Avtor) Halloran, Philip F (Avtor) donor-derived cell-free DNAkidney biopsydonor-specific antibodymicroarrays antibody-mediated rejectionkidney transplant rejectionEmerging treatments for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR, NEJM391(2):122-132) have increased the importance of ABMR detection when donor-specific antibody (DSA) is negative. We addressed this issue in the Trifecta-Kidney study (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04239703) using three centralized tests in 690 kidney transplant biopsies: DSA (One Lambda Inc.), blood donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA, Prospera™ test, Natera, Inc.), and molecular biopsy assessment (MMDx). We used an “AutoBanff 2022” algorithm to model the impact of alternative DSA interpretations on the histologic diagnosis of “DSA-negative” ABMR following Banff guidelines, including agreement with dd-cfDNA and molecular ABMR. Lowering MFI cutoffs for DSA-positivity did not improve detection of DSA-negative ABMR. However, simply calling all DSA positive allowed Banff 2022 guidelines to identify 46% more ABMR cases with no measurable DSA, and per Net Reclassification Improvement increased agreement between histologic diagnoses and both dd-cfDNA (P=7.72E-7) and molecular ABMR (P=7.69E-7). New ABMR cases were as strongly positive for dd-cfDNA and molecular ABMR as those found using the conventional DSA interpretation. A validation set analysis using INTERCOMEX study data (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT#01299168) confirmed these findings, and found that the new DSA-negative ABMR cases identified by calling all DSA positive had the same risk for graft loss as those found with conventional DSA interpretation.20262026-04-07 09:09:14Članek v reviji181417UDK: 616.61ISSN pri članku: 1600-6143DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.08.029COBISS_ID: 246735107sl