<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Integrated low-temperature washing and drying for sustainable hygiene of domestic laundry</dc:title><dc:creator>Fink,	Rok	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vozel,	Blanka	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lunder,	Manca	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Čuk,	Nina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tomšič,	Brigita	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>laundry</dc:subject><dc:subject>low temperature</dc:subject><dc:subject>washing</dc:subject><dc:subject>drying</dc:subject><dc:subject>microorganisms reduction</dc:subject><dc:subject>environmental impacts</dc:subject><dc:description>Low-temperature laundering is promoted to reduce the environmental impact of domestic textile care; however, washing at ≤ 40 °C is insufficient for hygienic decontamination, rendering the drying stage critical, as microbial survival strongly depends on moisture availability and drying conditions. This study systematically investigates the antimicrobial efficacy of low-temperature washing combined with different drying methods under controlled, household-relevant conditions, and directly links hygiene performance to environmental impact using life cycle assessment (LCA). Cotton carriers inoculated with representative bioindicators were washed at 30 °C using a commercial detergent and subsequently dried by high- and low-temperature tumble drying, controlled indoor air drying, and simulated outdoor solar exposure (Xenotest). Low-temperature washing alone resulted in limited microbial reduction, whereas drying led to substantial additional inactivation. Both high- and low-temperature tumble drying eliminated most microorganisms (&gt;7 log CFU cm⁻²), while simulated indoor air drying achieved significant reductions (∼6 log CFU cm⁻²), indicating that moisture reduction is a dominant mechanism of microbial inactivation, even without elevated drying temperatures. In this respect Xenotest treatment was less effective. The LCA showed that drying accounts for more than 50 % of the total environmental impact of the laundering process, with low-temperature tumble drying reducing overall impacts by approximately 20 % compared to high-temperature drying due to lower electricity consumption. By quantitatively linking microbial hygiene outcomes with environmental impacts, this study provides decision-relevant evidence for optimising domestic laundry practices, demonstrating that energy-efficient drying strategies can compensate for the hygienic limitations of low-temperature washing while significantly reducing the environmental footprint of textile care.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-02-01 04:37:26</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>178894</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 677</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2352-1864</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2026.104763</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 266818563</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
