<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>The Confucian Conception of Self</dc:title><dc:creator>Moore,	Thomas	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>comparative philosophy</dc:subject><dc:subject>Confucianism</dc:subject><dc:subject>relational self</dc:subject><dc:subject>Ren (仁)</dc:subject><dc:subject>self-cultivation</dc:subject><dc:description>In this paper, I clarify the Confucian conception of self by distinguishing it from com­mon misrepresentations, most notably its conflation with collectivism, as critiqued by Jana Rošker. These distortions, arguably rooted in the application of inappropriate West­ern frameworks, portray the Confucian self as self-effacing and subordinate to society. Drawing on key sinological and philosophical work, including that of David Hall, Roger Ames, and Jana Rošker, I argue instead that the Confucian self is relational and proces­sual: constituted through one’s roles and relationships, not erased by them. I develop this interpretation in two stages. First, I show through conceptual analysis how the Confucian self integrates individuality and interdependence by situating personhood in a shared awareness of social roles. Second, I analyse the Analects and Mencius to show how the ideal of ren (仁) embodies ethical self-cultivation as a dynamic, ongoing process. I con­clude that the Confucian self is best seen as a shared or social self-consciousness of roles and relations.

</dc:description><dc:date>0</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-23 09:06:19</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>178328</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN: 2232-5131</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>eISSN: 2350-4226</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2026.14.1.89-102</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
