<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Comparing Terraform and Ansible for Infrastructure as Code: A Containerized Full-Stack Web Application Case Study</dc:title><dc:creator>Djajkovska,	Anastasija	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jurič,	Branko Matjaž	(Mentor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>Infrastructure as Code</dc:subject><dc:subject>Terraform</dc:subject><dc:subject>Ansible</dc:subject><dc:subject>containerization</dc:subject><dc:subject>Azure</dc:subject><dc:subject>DevOps</dc:subject><dc:subject>automation.</dc:subject><dc:description>This thesis compares Terraform and Ansible for Infrastructure as Code (IaC)
through a containerized full-stack web application case study. Three ap-
proaches are tested: Terraform-only, Ansible-only, and hybrid implementa-
tions, measuring their performance in infrastructure provisioning, application
deployment, and resource cleanup. The thesis tracks deployment times and
reliability, error rates, and operational complexity across Azure cloud infras-
tructure using Docker Compose for consistent testing. Insights into each
tool’s strengths and limitations are provided. The findings offer practical
guidance for developers and organizations with containerized applications,
helping them choose the most suitable IaC approach for their deployment
needs without requiring complex orchestration platforms.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2025-07-14 16:30:01</dc:date><dc:type>Diplomsko delo/naloga</dc:type><dc:identifier>170755</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>VisID: 38171</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 227808771</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
