<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Increasing fluroquinolone susceptibility and genetic diversity of ESBL-producing E. coli from the lower respiratory tract during the COVID-19 pandemic</dc:title><dc:creator>Hrovat,	Katja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Seme,	Katja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ambrožič,	Jerneja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>antimicrobial resistance</dc:subject><dc:subject>Escherichia coli</dc:subject><dc:subject>extended-spectrum β-lactamases</dc:subject><dc:subject>lower respiratory tract</dc:subject><dc:subject>COVID-19</dc:subject><dc:description>Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are the fourth leading cause of death worldwide, among which Escherichia coli (E. coli) pneumonia is considered a rare phenomenon. Treatment options for LRTIs have become limited, especially for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli (ESBL-EC), which are usually resistant to other groups of antimicrobials as well. The aim of our study was to compare the phenotypic resistance profiles and genotypes of ESBL-EC isolates associated with LRTIs before (pre-COVID-19) and during (COVID-19) the COVID-19 pandemic. All isolates were screened for antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and virulence-associated genes (VAGs) and assigned to phylogenetic groups, sequence types and clonal groups by PCR. During the pandemic, a significantly lower proportion of ciprofloxacin-, levofloxacin- and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant ESBL-EC isolates was retrieved from lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples. PCR-based genotypization revealed greater clonal diversity and a significantly lower proportion of isolates with bla$_{TEM}$, aac(6′)-Ib-cr and qacE∆1 genes. In addition, a higher proportion of isolates with the integrase gene int1 and virulence genes sat and tsh was confirmed. The lower prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance and greater genetic diversity of ESBL-EC isolated during the COVID-19 period may have been due to the introduction of new bacterial strains into the hospital environment, along with changes in clinical establishment guidelines and practices.</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2025-05-27 12:04:53</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>169393</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 615</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2079-6382</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13090797</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 205359875</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
