<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Comparison of flood hydrograph prediction between synthetic unit hydrograph methods and rain-on-grid model for Katulampa watershed, Indonesia</dc:title><dc:creator>Minola Ginting,	Bobby	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lidyana,	Prilla	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Christopher,	Cleon	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yudianto,	Doddi	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yuebo,	Xie	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>DEM</dc:subject><dc:subject>Katulampa</dc:subject><dc:subject>synthetic unit hydrograph</dc:subject><dc:subject>HEC-RAS</dc:subject><dc:subject>rain-on-grid</dc:subject><dc:description>In this paper, 6 synthetic unit hydrograph (SUH) methods, namely Snyder, SCS, GAMA-1, ITB-1, ITB-2, and Nakayasu, were compared against a rain-on-grid model (HEC-RAS) for flood hydrograph prediction in the Katulampa watershed, Indonesia. HEC-RAS was used with an open-access, ~30 m resolution digital elevation model (DEM), i.e. the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS). The relative error of the hydrograph results (peak discharge and time-to-peak) were compared with the observed data, while the errors in the hydrograph’s shape were detected using the Root Mean Square Error  and Pearson Product Moment Correlation. We found that HEC-RAS could predict the flood hydrograph significantly more accurately than the SUH methods, yielding the value of 1.98 m3 /s and the value of 0.93. This study remains an interesting example of how modern computational tool can improve the runoff prediction of conventional SUH methods.</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:date>2024-10-07 10:23:54</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>163424</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 004.9:556.166-047.48(594)</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 0352-3551</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 210442755</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
