<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>On the equality of domination number and 2-domination number</dc:title><dc:creator>Boruzanli Ekinci,	Gülnaz	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bujtás,	Csilla	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>domination number</dc:subject><dc:subject>2-domination number</dc:subject><dc:subject>hereditary property</dc:subject><dc:subject>computational complexity</dc:subject><dc:description>The $2$-domination number $\gamma_2(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $D \subseteq V(G)$ for which every vertex outside $D$ is adjacent to at least two vertices in ▫$D$▫. Clearly, $\gamma_2(G)$ cannot be smaller than the domination number $\gamma(G)$. We consider a large class of graphs and characterize those members which satisfy $\gamma_2=\gamma$. For the general case, we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether $\gamma_2=\gamma$ holds. We also give a necessary and sufficient condition for a graph to satisfy the equality hereditarily.</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2024-10-02 14:04:18</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>163136</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 519.17</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 1234-3099</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.7151/dmgt.2452</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 117087491</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
