<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Public procurement and bank lending</dc:title><dc:creator>Burger,	Anže	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Marinč,	Matej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Polanec,	Sašo	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kotnik,	Patricia	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>public orders</dc:subject><dc:subject>banking</dc:subject><dc:subject>analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>public procurement</dc:subject><dc:subject>government procurement</dc:subject><dc:subject>lending</dc:subject><dc:subject>synthetic control method</dc:subject><dc:subject>causal mediation analysis</dc:subject><dc:description>This article unveils that government is intertwined with banking through a hitherto underexplored channel—through public procurement. On a comprehensive firm-level dataset that combines public procurement and accounting data, we apply the difference-in-differences method to show that treated firms that secure a public procurement contract can strengthen their bank borrowing terms. Treated firms obtain a greater amount of bank funding and a higher share of long-term funding at lower interest rates compared to the control firms. The impact on bank lending exceeds the positive impact due to higher revenues and suggests a positive non-revenue channel of public procurement.</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2024-06-24 12:22:47</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>158970</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 336</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 1544-6123</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.105623</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 198109955</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
