<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Modelling and environmental assessment of a stand-alone micro-grid system in a mountain hut using renewables</dc:title><dc:creator>Mori,	Mitja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gutiérrez,	Manuel	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sekavčnik,	Mihael	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Drobnič,	Boštjan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>mountain huts</dc:subject><dc:subject>micro-grid</dc:subject><dc:subject>renewable energy sources</dc:subject><dc:subject>computational modelling</dc:subject><dc:subject>experiments</dc:subject><dc:subject>lifecycle assessment</dc:subject><dc:subject>investment costs</dc:subject><dc:subject>payback time</dc:subject><dc:description>Mountain huts are stand-alone micro-grid systems that are not connected to a power grid. However, they impact the environment by generating electricity and through day-to-day operations. The installed generator needs to be flexible to cover fluctuations in the energy demand. Replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy sources presents a challenge when it comes to balancing electricity generation and consumption. This paper presents an integration-and-optimization process for renewable energy sources in a mountain hut’s electricity generation system combined with a lifecycle assessment. A custom computational model was developed, validated with experimental data and integrated into a TRNSYS model. Five different electricity generation topologies were modelled to find the best configuration that matches the dynamics and meets the cumulative electricity demand. A lifecycle assessment methodology was used to evaluate the environmental impacts of all the topologies for one typical operating year. The carbon footprint could be reduced by 34% in the case of the actually implemented system upgrade, and by up to 47% in the case of 100% renewable electricity generation. An investment cost analysis shows that improving the battery charging strategy has a minor effect on the payback time, but it can significantly reduce the environmental impacts.</dc:description><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:date>2022-05-20 10:58:30</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>136776</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 502.174.3:728.61:620.92</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 1996-1073</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en15010202</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 91685379</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
