<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Evaluation of several approaches for deriving weights in fuzzy group analytic hierarchy process</dc:title><dc:creator>Grošelj,	Petra	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zadnik Stirn,	Lidija	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>decision-making models</dc:subject><dc:subject>fuzzy analytic hierarchy process</dc:subject><dc:subject>triangular fuzzy numbers</dc:subject><dc:subject>soft consensus</dc:subject><dc:description>The paper discusses fuzzy group analytic hierarchy process. In the literature, there are found several approaches for determining weights either directly from the individual judgments or via group comparison matrix. However, the quality of the group weights was not studied yet. In the paper, we propose two new measures for the evaluation of the group weights that are adapted from classical analytic hierarchy process. We selected six approaches for deriving weights and use them in an application from the literature. We evaluated the gained weights. Our results show that the weights derived by the most popular extent analysis method are questionable in their reliability.</dc:description><dc:date>2018</dc:date><dc:date>2020-02-19 12:37:47</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>114173</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 519.8</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 1246-0125</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.1080/12460125.2018.1460160</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 5063590</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>OceCobissID: 515053593</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
