<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=190532"><dc:title>Interpretable by design</dc:title><dc:creator>Miok,	Kristian	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Škrlj,	Blaž	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Robnik Šikonja,	Marko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pârvulescu,	Lucian	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>species distribution modelling</dc:subject><dc:subject>large language models</dc:subject><dc:subject>interpretable machine learning</dc:subject><dc:subject>decision trees</dc:subject><dc:subject>ecological rules</dc:subject><dc:subject>freshwater crayfish</dc:subject><dc:description>Predictive models in biodiversity research face a persistent trade-off between accuracy and interpretability. Complex machine learning approaches often achieve high predictive power, yet their opacity limits ecological understanding and undermines trust in conservation decision-making. Here we present a transparent framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to generate shallow, human-auditable decision-tree ensembles for predicting species distributions. Using three freshwater crayfish with contrasting ecological contexts, Austropotamobius torrentium (well-studied native), A. bihariensis (data-poor endemic), and Faxonius limosus (invasive generalist), we show that LLM-derived rule ensembles are competitive with both shallow decision trees and random forests (Macro-F1: 0.708 for A. torrentium, 0.689 for A. bihariensis, 0.927 for F. limosus), and provide the best performance among all tested models for the data-poor endemic A. bihariensis, where random forests exhibited the highest variance across folds (SD = 0.142). On three synthetic datasets with known ground-truth ecological rules, the LLM recovers true thresholds within 1% accuracy, providing methodological validation that the generated rules reflect genuine ecological structure rather than statistical noise. Beyond performance, the framework yields human-auditable explanations for every prediction, including explicit decision paths, supporting rules, and stable ecological rationales across cross-validation folds. These results suggest that, for structured ecological problems, interpretable models built from LLM-generated rules can approach black-box accuracy, particularly under data scarcity, while offering a practical pathway toward trustworthy biodiversity modelling in conservation applications.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-10-29 14:41:40</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>190532</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
