<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=190486"><dc:title>The choice between te morau and te kureru in discourse</dc:title><dc:creator>Ikeya,	Tomoko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>Japanese linguistics</dc:subject><dc:subject>benefactive constructions</dc:subject><dc:subject>in-group/out-group relations</dc:subject><dc:subject>speaker–hearer relationship</dc:subject><dc:subject>politeness</dc:subject><dc:description>This study examines the distinction between the Japanese benefactive auxiliary constructions te kureru and te morau in discourse. Previous research has attributed their differences mainly to politeness and speaker initiative, but these do not fully explain variation in actual conversations. We argue that hearer group membership (in-group vs. out-group) is a key factor in the choice of expression. Fifty-six Japanese female university students completed a questionnaire in which they selected expressions they would use in hypothetical benefit situations. The results showed a strong preference for te kureru with in-group hearers and te morau with out-group hearers, even in identical situations. These findings suggest that psychological alignment shapes the choice of benefactive expression and that te morau is perceived as more polite because it maintains interpersonal distance.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-10-29 13:23:06</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>190486</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
