<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=190482"><dc:title>Verb-copying constructions in Chinese</dc:title><dc:creator>Yang,	Yongzhong	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>verb-copying construction</dc:subject><dc:subject>empty predicate</dc:subject><dc:subject>empty argument</dc:subject><dc:subject>perfectiveness</dc:subject><dc:subject>feature checking</dc:subject><dc:description>It is argued that structurally the basic form of verb-copying constructions is [$_{VP1}$ NP1 [$_{V`}$ V1 [$_{VP2}$  NP2 [$_{V`}$ V2 XP]]]]. V1 is identical to V2 in terms of form, and V1 is a lexical item that is inserted in the course of derivation. XP has multiple properties. Such a structural architecture is based on the dual requirement of the syntactic system and the conceptual/semantic system. The arguments occupy different positions due to their different theta-roles and syntactic configurations, which give rise to lexical representations that are derived by the computational system in different ways to generate various types of verb-copying constructions.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-10-29 13:16:55</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>190482</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
