<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=189453"><dc:title>Rethinking pedagogy in higher education amid turbulent times</dc:title><dc:creator>Katalin Korpics,	Márta	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bajnok,	Andrea	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>higher education</dc:subject><dc:subject>pedagogical changes</dc:subject><dc:subject>institutional development</dc:subject><dc:description>Global  challenges  (labour  market  expectations,  digital  technology,  the  massing  of  higher  education)  are  constantly  changing  the  way  higher  education is managed. Responses to change can be planned. Responses from  higher  education  stakeholders  can  be  interesting  and  instructive  for other institutions, as these examples can be incorporated into their own responses. The purpose of the study is to present the top-down pedagogical reform process that started in 2019 at the University of Public Service in Budapest. Although initiated by the university’s educational strategy, its implementation depends on the teachers who have actively created  innovative  pedagogical  spaces  that  ensure  sustainability.  These  innovative  spaces  include  training  sessions  for  teachers,  workshops,  thematic  discussions  on  teaching  methodology,  methodological  publications,  research  and  the  annual  Innovative  Department  Award.  The  stages  of  the  process  and  the  results  and  challenges  of  each  stage  were  documented using a case study method. The description helps to illustrate  how  a  process  of  pedagogical  reform,  with  which  the  university  leadership’s  goal  is  rapid,  systemic  change  affecting  the  work  of  hundreds of teachers, can be developed and sustained on the basis of commitment from teachers and institutional determination.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-10-07 09:48:59</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>189453</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
