<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=188717"><dc:title>Integration of embodied carbon into a decision support framework for building renovation, considering energy and seismic performance</dc:title><dc:creator>Piña Fernández,	Pablo	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cerovšek,	Tomo	(Mentor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Stegnar,	Gašper	(Komentor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>master thesis</dc:subject><dc:subject>civil engineering</dc:subject><dc:subject>whole life carbon</dc:subject><dc:subject>embodied carbon</dc:subject><dc:subject>building renovation</dc:subject><dc:subject>life cycle assessment</dc:subject><dc:subject>seismic performance</dc:subject><dc:subject>life cycle costing</dc:subject><dc:subject>multi-criteria decision making</dc:subject><dc:subject>decision support framework</dc:subject><dc:description>As operational emissions decline, embodied carbon becomes increasingly important in Europe’s post-war residential stock, where energy and seismic deficiencies may coexist. This research develops and evaluates a BIM/HBIM-based Decision Support Framework integrating Whole Life Carbon (WLC), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), energy performance, Life Cycle Costing (LCC), seismic evidence, and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). A 50-year period and GIFA = 3,848 m² are adopted. Applied to a Type A1 building in Ljubljana, the framework compares five scenarios from existing condition to replacement. MCDM integrates EUI, non-operational GWP, discounted LCC, and EC8-relative seismic resistance derived from external technical evidence; no dynamic seismic analysis was performed as part of this thesis. S1 achieves the lowest WLC (1,108.7 kgCO₂e/m² GIFA) but retains the S0 seismic reference of 9.6%. S3 improves energy, WLC, and LCC relative to S2 while maintaining approximately 98% EC8 resistance. S4 achieves the lowest EUI (163.25 kWh/m²·year), discounted LCC (472.83 €/m² GIFA), and the adopted 100% EC8 reference. With equal weights, S4 achieves the highest MCDM score (0.940) and ranks first in 95.23% of 176,851 combinations. The hypothesis that S3 would achieve the lowest WLC is not confirmed. The framework enables transparent comparison of carbon, energy, cost, and seismic trade-offs. S4’s result applies only within the quantified criteria, weighting structure, assumptions, and modelled system boundaries and does not establish universal superiority of replacement over retrofit.</dc:description><dc:publisher>[P. Piña Fernández]</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-09-26 08:45:28</dc:date><dc:type>Magistrsko delo/naloga</dc:type><dc:identifier>188717</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
