<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=184729"><dc:title>Possible ways to protect the interests of platform workers</dc:title><dc:creator>Ignjatović,	Miroljub	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>digital labour platforms</dc:subject><dc:subject>platform work</dc:subject><dc:subject>precarisation</dc:subject><dc:subject>control</dc:subject><dc:subject>algorithms</dc:subject><dc:subject>collective bargaining</dc:subject><dc:subject>labor standards</dc:subject><dc:subject>precarious work</dc:subject><dc:subject>workers' rights</dc:subject><dc:description>The article examines the transformation of power relations in the platform economy and ways to protect the interests of platform workers under algorithmic control. With critical analysis of the concepts of precarisation and control (Kalleberg et al., Edwards, Foucault), digital labour platforms are shown to create new forms of dependency and insecurity, yet also new opportunities for resistance. Four levels of interest protection are identified: individual and collective resistance tactics, the establishment of platform cooperatives, organised collective representation, and legislative measures by states and the EU. In the conclusion, emphasis is given to the need for collective, technological and legal spheres to act in unison to ensure decent work in the digital age.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-07-14 19:05:19</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>184729</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
