<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=183995"><dc:title>A context-aware decision support framework for scientific experiment configuration</dc:title><dc:creator>Miri,	Pouriya	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Stankovski,	Vlado	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Veljković,	Kristina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kochovski,	Petar	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>contextualisation</dc:subject><dc:subject>decision-making</dc:subject><dc:subject>human–AI interaction</dc:subject><dc:subject>Markov decision process</dc:subject><dc:subject>MDP</dc:subject><dc:subject>scientific experiment</dc:subject><dc:description>Introduction: Defining an experimental configuration is a complex decision problem for early-stage researchers, who must map goals, constraints, and requirements onto datasets, algorithms, and parameter settings that directly affect experimental outcomes. Existing scientific workflow engines improve execution and reproducibility; however, they rarely capture the decision rationale behind configuration choices, which is needed to inform future selections.
Method: We propose a context-aware decision-support framework that formalises experiment configuration as a structured and sequential decision problem. The framework combines three components: a semantic Knowledge Graph (KG) storing historical configurations, contextual attributes, and decision rationale; an MDP-based Option Explorer that filters the KG under user-defined constraints and ranks feasible configurations by expected cumulative reward; and a Graphical User Interface for specifying constraints, inspecting ranked alternatives, and providing structured feedback. Unlike existing workflow systems, the framework explicitly separates user-defined context from automated reasoning, producing an interpretable ranked list rather than a single opaque recommendation. We evaluated the framework in a user study with 90 MSc- and PhD-level researchers performing a model-selection task, using a synthetic dataset of one million experimental configurations under three levels of contextual detail.
Results: Compared with manual search, the framework reduced decision time (up to 68%), reduced perceived difficulty (up to 36%), and increased user satisfaction (up to 43%) under the constrained condition.
Conclusion: By formalising the link between experimental context and probabilistic decision ranking, the framework improves reproducibility and scalability of decision support in scientific experimentation.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-06-23 14:43:50</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>183995</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
