<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=183149"><dc:title>Still life in movement</dc:title><dc:creator>Vidrih,	Rebeka	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>art history</dc:subject><dc:subject>painting</dc:subject><dc:subject>still life</dc:subject><dc:description>By the juxtaposition or the intertwinement of the two arguably seminal texts on still life, Charles Sterling’s comprehensive art historical study and Gérard Wajcman’s theo-retical, philosophical commentary thereon, the interpretative net is firmly established; the impression is given that all that is left is the reiteration of the well-trodden paths. However, neither the historical presentation of still life’s linear emancipation from his-toria nor the following ontological definition of the emancipated still life is so simple. Still life as a specific iconographic genre is shown to be, contrary to its name, in a per-petual state of becoming, of movement. And more, as soon as the goal of emancipation from the historical painting is achieved, the movement becomes inverted: a renewed relationship between still life and historia follows on another level. On the other hand, it is shown that still life is only rarely completely devoid of some narrative content.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-06-05 11:51:42</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>183149</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
